2023-07-15 10:53:12,826 INFO  [main] hbase.HBaseClassTestRule(94): Test class org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer.TestBalancerDecision timeout: 13 mins
2023-07-15 10:53:13,151 WARN  [Time-limited test] impl.MetricsConfig(128): Cannot locate configuration: tried hadoop-metrics2-hbase.properties,hadoop-metrics2.properties
2023-07-15 10:53:13,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] metrics.MetricRegistriesLoader(60): Loaded MetricRegistries class org.apache.hadoop.hbase.metrics.impl.MetricRegistriesImpl
2023-07-15 10:53:13,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-15 10:53:13,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 0.0 etc.
2023-07-15 10:53:13,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] hbase.ResourceChecker(147): before: master.balancer.TestBalancerDecision#testBalancerDecisions Thread=12, OpenFileDescriptor=263, MaxFileDescriptor=60000, SystemLoadAverage=288, ProcessCount=175, AvailableMemoryMB=7770
2023-07-15 10:53:13,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-15 10:53:13,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 0.0 etc.
2023-07-15 10:53:13,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-15 10:53:13,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=true, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 0.0 etc.
2023-07-15 10:53:13,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:13,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:13,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:13,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:13,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:13,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:13,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:13,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:13,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv575800752=1, srv2100453406=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv575800752=1, srv2100453406=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1767427706=1, srv1714056624=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1767427706=1, srv1714056624=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1948585401=0, srv746723003=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1948585401=0, srv746723003=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1171850842=0, srv1547321109=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1171850842=0, srv1547321109=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1171850842=0, srv1547321109=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1811954113=1, srv1077168284=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1811954113=1, srv1077168284=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1811954113=1, srv1077168284=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1811954113=1, srv1077168284=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv817490135=1, srv2099861943=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv592075599=0, srv675677381=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv819336569=0, srv920604552=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv819336569=0, srv920604552=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv819336569=0, srv920604552=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv819336569=0, srv920604552=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv819336569=0, srv920604552=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv819336569=0, srv920604552=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv819336569=0, srv920604552=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv819336569=0, srv920604552=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv819336569=0, srv920604552=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv819336569=0, srv920604552=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1380
2023-07-15 10:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1381
2023-07-15 10:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table880
2023-07-15 10:53:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table880) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1140
2023-07-15 10:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1382
2023-07-15 10:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table881
2023-07-15 10:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table881) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1141
2023-07-15 10:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1383
2023-07-15 10:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table640
2023-07-15 10:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table640) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table882
2023-07-15 10:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table882) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1142
2023-07-15 10:53:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1384
2023-07-15 10:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table641
2023-07-15 10:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table641) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table883
2023-07-15 10:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table883) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1143
2023-07-15 10:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1385
2023-07-15 10:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table400
2023-07-15 10:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table642
2023-07-15 10:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table642) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table884
2023-07-15 10:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table884) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1144
2023-07-15 10:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1386
2023-07-15 10:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table401
2023-07-15 10:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table643
2023-07-15 10:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table643) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table885
2023-07-15 10:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table885) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1145
2023-07-15 10:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1387
2023-07-15 10:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table402
2023-07-15 10:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table644
2023-07-15 10:53:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table644) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table886
2023-07-15 10:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table886) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table403
2023-07-15 10:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table645
2023-07-15 10:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table645) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table887
2023-07-15 10:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table887) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table404
2023-07-15 10:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table646
2023-07-15 10:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table646) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table888
2023-07-15 10:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table888) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table405
2023-07-15 10:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table647
2023-07-15 10:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table647) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table889
2023-07-15 10:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table889) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table406
2023-07-15 10:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table648
2023-07-15 10:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table648) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table407
2023-07-15 10:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table649
2023-07-15 10:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table649) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table408
2023-07-15 10:53:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table409
2023-07-15 10:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1146
2023-07-15 10:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1388
2023-07-15 10:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1147
2023-07-15 10:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1389
2023-07-15 10:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1148
2023-07-15 10:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1149
2023-07-15 10:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1370
2023-07-15 10:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1371
2023-07-15 10:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table870
2023-07-15 10:53:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table870) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1130
2023-07-15 10:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1372
2023-07-15 10:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table871
2023-07-15 10:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table871) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1131
2023-07-15 10:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1373
2023-07-15 10:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table630
2023-07-15 10:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table630) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table872
2023-07-15 10:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table872) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1132
2023-07-15 10:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1374
2023-07-15 10:53:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table631
2023-07-15 10:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table631) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table873
2023-07-15 10:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table873) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1133
2023-07-15 10:53:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1375
2023-07-15 10:53:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table632
2023-07-15 10:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table632) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table874
2023-07-15 10:53:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table874) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1134
2023-07-15 10:53:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1376
2023-07-15 10:53:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table633
2023-07-15 10:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table633) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table875
2023-07-15 10:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table875) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table634
2023-07-15 10:53:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table634) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table876
2023-07-15 10:53:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table876) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table635
2023-07-15 10:53:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table635) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table877
2023-07-15 10:53:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table877) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table636
2023-07-15 10:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table636) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table878
2023-07-15 10:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table878) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table637
2023-07-15 10:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table637) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table879
2023-07-15 10:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table879) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table638
2023-07-15 10:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table638) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table639
2023-07-15 10:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table639) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1135
2023-07-15 10:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1377
2023-07-15 10:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1136
2023-07-15 10:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1378
2023-07-15 10:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1137
2023-07-15 10:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1379
2023-07-15 10:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1138
2023-07-15 10:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1139
2023-07-15 10:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table660
2023-07-15 10:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table660) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1360
2023-07-15 10:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table661
2023-07-15 10:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table661) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1361
2023-07-15 10:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table420
2023-07-15 10:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table662
2023-07-15 10:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table662) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1120
2023-07-15 10:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1362
2023-07-15 10:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table421
2023-07-15 10:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table663
2023-07-15 10:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table663) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1121
2023-07-15 10:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1363
2023-07-15 10:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table422
2023-07-15 10:53:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table664
2023-07-15 10:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table664) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1122
2023-07-15 10:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1364
2023-07-15 10:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table423
2023-07-15 10:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table665
2023-07-15 10:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table665) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1123
2023-07-15 10:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1365
2023-07-15 10:53:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table424
2023-07-15 10:53:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table666
2023-07-15 10:53:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table666) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table425
2023-07-15 10:53:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table667
2023-07-15 10:53:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table667) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table426
2023-07-15 10:53:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table668
2023-07-15 10:53:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table668) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table427
2023-07-15 10:53:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table669
2023-07-15 10:53:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table669) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table428
2023-07-15 10:53:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table429
2023-07-15 10:53:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1124
2023-07-15 10:53:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1366
2023-07-15 10:53:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1125
2023-07-15 10:53:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1367
2023-07-15 10:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1126
2023-07-15 10:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1368
2023-07-15 10:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1127
2023-07-15 10:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1369
2023-07-15 10:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1128
2023-07-15 10:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1129
2023-07-15 10:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table890
2023-07-15 10:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table890) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table891
2023-07-15 10:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table891) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table650
2023-07-15 10:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table650) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table892
2023-07-15 10:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table892) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1350
2023-07-15 10:53:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table651
2023-07-15 10:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table651) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table893
2023-07-15 10:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table893) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1351
2023-07-15 10:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table410
2023-07-15 10:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table652
2023-07-15 10:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table652) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table894
2023-07-15 10:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table894) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1110
2023-07-15 10:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1352
2023-07-15 10:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table411
2023-07-15 10:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table653
2023-07-15 10:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table653) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table895
2023-07-15 10:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table895) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1111
2023-07-15 10:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1353
2023-07-15 10:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table412
2023-07-15 10:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table654
2023-07-15 10:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table654) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table896
2023-07-15 10:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table896) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1112
2023-07-15 10:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1354
2023-07-15 10:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table413
2023-07-15 10:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table655
2023-07-15 10:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table655) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table897
2023-07-15 10:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table897) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table414
2023-07-15 10:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table656
2023-07-15 10:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table656) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table898
2023-07-15 10:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table898) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table415
2023-07-15 10:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table657
2023-07-15 10:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table657) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table899
2023-07-15 10:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table899) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table416
2023-07-15 10:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table658
2023-07-15 10:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table658) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table417
2023-07-15 10:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table659
2023-07-15 10:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table659) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table418
2023-07-15 10:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table419
2023-07-15 10:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1113
2023-07-15 10:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1355
2023-07-15 10:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1114
2023-07-15 10:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1356
2023-07-15 10:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1115
2023-07-15 10:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1357
2023-07-15 10:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1116
2023-07-15 10:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1358
2023-07-15 10:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1117
2023-07-15 10:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1359
2023-07-15 10:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1118
2023-07-15 10:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1119
2023-07-15 10:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1182
2023-07-15 10:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1183
2023-07-15 10:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1184
2023-07-15 10:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1185
2023-07-15 10:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1186
2023-07-15 10:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1187
2023-07-15 10:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table840
2023-07-15 10:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table840) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1188
2023-07-15 10:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table841
2023-07-15 10:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table841) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1189
2023-07-15 10:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table600
2023-07-15 10:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table600) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table842
2023-07-15 10:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table842) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table601
2023-07-15 10:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table601) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table843
2023-07-15 10:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table843) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table602
2023-07-15 10:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table602) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table844
2023-07-15 10:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table844) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table603
2023-07-15 10:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table603) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table845
2023-07-15 10:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table845) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table604
2023-07-15 10:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table604) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table846
2023-07-15 10:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table846) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table605
2023-07-15 10:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table605) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table847
2023-07-15 10:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table847) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table606
2023-07-15 10:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table606) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table848
2023-07-15 10:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table848) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1180
2023-07-15 10:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table607
2023-07-15 10:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table607) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table849
2023-07-15 10:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table849) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1181
2023-07-15 10:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table608
2023-07-15 10:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table608) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table609
2023-07-15 10:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table609) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1171
2023-07-15 10:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1172
2023-07-15 10:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1173
2023-07-15 10:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1174
2023-07-15 10:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1175
2023-07-15 10:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1176
2023-07-15 10:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1177
2023-07-15 10:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table830
2023-07-15 10:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table830) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1178
2023-07-15 10:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table831
2023-07-15 10:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table831) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table832
2023-07-15 10:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table832) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table833
2023-07-15 10:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table833) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table834
2023-07-15 10:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table834) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table835
2023-07-15 10:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table835) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table836
2023-07-15 10:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table836) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table837
2023-07-15 10:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table837) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table838
2023-07-15 10:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table838) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1170
2023-07-15 10:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table839
2023-07-15 10:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table839) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1179
2023-07-15 10:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1160
2023-07-15 10:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1161
2023-07-15 10:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1162
2023-07-15 10:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1163
2023-07-15 10:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table860
2023-07-15 10:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table860) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1164
2023-07-15 10:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table861
2023-07-15 10:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table861) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1165
2023-07-15 10:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table620
2023-07-15 10:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table620) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table862
2023-07-15 10:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table862) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1166
2023-07-15 10:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table621
2023-07-15 10:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table621) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table863
2023-07-15 10:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table863) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1167
2023-07-15 10:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table622
2023-07-15 10:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table622) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table864
2023-07-15 10:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table864) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table623
2023-07-15 10:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table623) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table865
2023-07-15 10:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table865) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table624
2023-07-15 10:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table624) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table866
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table866) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table625
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table625) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table867
2023-07-15 10:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table867) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table626
2023-07-15 10:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table626) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table868
2023-07-15 10:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table868) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table627
2023-07-15 10:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table627) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table869
2023-07-15 10:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table869) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table628
2023-07-15 10:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table628) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table629
2023-07-15 10:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table629) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1168
2023-07-15 10:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1169
2023-07-15 10:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1391
2023-07-15 10:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1150
2023-07-15 10:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1392
2023-07-15 10:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1151
2023-07-15 10:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1393
2023-07-15 10:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1152
2023-07-15 10:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1394
2023-07-15 10:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1153
2023-07-15 10:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1395
2023-07-15 10:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table850
2023-07-15 10:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table850) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1154
2023-07-15 10:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1396
2023-07-15 10:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table851
2023-07-15 10:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table851) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1155
2023-07-15 10:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1397
2023-07-15 10:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table610
2023-07-15 10:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table610) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table852
2023-07-15 10:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table852) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1156
2023-07-15 10:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1398
2023-07-15 10:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table611
2023-07-15 10:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table611) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table853
2023-07-15 10:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table853) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table612
2023-07-15 10:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table612) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table854
2023-07-15 10:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table854) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table613
2023-07-15 10:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table613) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table855
2023-07-15 10:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table855) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table614
2023-07-15 10:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table614) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table856
2023-07-15 10:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table856) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table615
2023-07-15 10:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table615) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table857
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table857) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table616
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table616) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table858
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table858) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table617
2023-07-15 10:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table617) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table859
2023-07-15 10:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table859) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table618
2023-07-15 10:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table618) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1390
2023-07-15 10:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table619
2023-07-15 10:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table619) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1157
2023-07-15 10:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1399
2023-07-15 10:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1158
2023-07-15 10:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1159
2023-07-15 10:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table240
2023-07-15 10:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table482
2023-07-15 10:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table241
2023-07-15 10:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table483
2023-07-15 10:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table242
2023-07-15 10:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table484
2023-07-15 10:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table243
2023-07-15 10:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table485
2023-07-15 10:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table244
2023-07-15 10:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table486
2023-07-15 10:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table245
2023-07-15 10:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table487
2023-07-15 10:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table246
2023-07-15 10:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table488
2023-07-15 10:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table247
2023-07-15 10:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table489
2023-07-15 10:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table248
2023-07-15 10:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table249
2023-07-15 10:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1308
2023-07-15 10:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1309
2023-07-15 10:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1300
2023-07-15 10:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1301
2023-07-15 10:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1302
2023-07-15 10:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1303
2023-07-15 10:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1304
2023-07-15 10:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table490
2023-07-15 10:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1305
2023-07-15 10:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table491
2023-07-15 10:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1306
2023-07-15 10:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table250
2023-07-15 10:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table492
2023-07-15 10:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1307
2023-07-15 10:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table471
2023-07-15 10:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table230
2023-07-15 10:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table472
2023-07-15 10:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table231
2023-07-15 10:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table473
2023-07-15 10:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table232
2023-07-15 10:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table474
2023-07-15 10:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table233
2023-07-15 10:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table475
2023-07-15 10:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table234
2023-07-15 10:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table476
2023-07-15 10:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table235
2023-07-15 10:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table477
2023-07-15 10:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table236
2023-07-15 10:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table478
2023-07-15 10:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table237
2023-07-15 10:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table479
2023-07-15 10:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table238
2023-07-15 10:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table239
2023-07-15 10:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table480
2023-07-15 10:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table481
2023-07-15 10:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table262
2023-07-15 10:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table263
2023-07-15 10:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table264
2023-07-15 10:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table265
2023-07-15 10:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table266
2023-07-15 10:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table267
2023-07-15 10:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table268
2023-07-15 10:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table269
2023-07-15 10:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table270
2023-07-15 10:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table271
2023-07-15 10:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table272
2023-07-15 10:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table251
2023-07-15 10:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table493
2023-07-15 10:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table252
2023-07-15 10:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table494
2023-07-15 10:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table253
2023-07-15 10:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table495
2023-07-15 10:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table254
2023-07-15 10:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table496
2023-07-15 10:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table255
2023-07-15 10:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table497
2023-07-15 10:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table256
2023-07-15 10:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table498
2023-07-15 10:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table257
2023-07-15 10:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table499
2023-07-15 10:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table258
2023-07-15 10:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table259
2023-07-15 10:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table260
2023-07-15 10:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table261
2023-07-15 10:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table680
2023-07-15 10:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table680) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table681
2023-07-15 10:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table681) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table440
2023-07-15 10:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table682
2023-07-15 10:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table682) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table441
2023-07-15 10:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table683
2023-07-15 10:53:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table683) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table200
2023-07-15 10:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table442
2023-07-15 10:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table684
2023-07-15 10:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table684) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1340
2023-07-15 10:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table201
2023-07-15 10:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table443
2023-07-15 10:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table685
2023-07-15 10:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table685) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1341
2023-07-15 10:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table202
2023-07-15 10:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table444
2023-07-15 10:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table686
2023-07-15 10:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table686) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1100
2023-07-15 10:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1342
2023-07-15 10:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table203
2023-07-15 10:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table445
2023-07-15 10:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table687
2023-07-15 10:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table687) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1101
2023-07-15 10:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1343
2023-07-15 10:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table204
2023-07-15 10:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table446
2023-07-15 10:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table688
2023-07-15 10:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table688) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table205
2023-07-15 10:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table447
2023-07-15 10:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table689
2023-07-15 10:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table689) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table206
2023-07-15 10:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table448
2023-07-15 10:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table207
2023-07-15 10:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table449
2023-07-15 10:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table208
2023-07-15 10:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table209
2023-07-15 10:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1102
2023-07-15 10:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1344
2023-07-15 10:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1103
2023-07-15 10:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1345
2023-07-15 10:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1104
2023-07-15 10:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1346
2023-07-15 10:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1105
2023-07-15 10:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1347
2023-07-15 10:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1106
2023-07-15 10:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1348
2023-07-15 10:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1107
2023-07-15 10:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1349
2023-07-15 10:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1108
2023-07-15 10:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table690
2023-07-15 10:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table690) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1109
2023-07-15 10:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table670
2023-07-15 10:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table670) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table671
2023-07-15 10:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table671) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table430
2023-07-15 10:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table672
2023-07-15 10:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table672) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table431
2023-07-15 10:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table673
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table673) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table432
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table674
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table674) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1330
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table433
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table675
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table675) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1331
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table434
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table676
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table676) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1332
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table435
2023-07-15 10:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table677
2023-07-15 10:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table677) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table436
2023-07-15 10:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table678
2023-07-15 10:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table678) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table437
2023-07-15 10:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table679
2023-07-15 10:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table679) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table438
2023-07-15 10:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table439
2023-07-15 10:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1333
2023-07-15 10:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1334
2023-07-15 10:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1335
2023-07-15 10:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1336
2023-07-15 10:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1337
2023-07-15 10:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1338
2023-07-15 10:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1339
2023-07-15 10:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table460
2023-07-15 10:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table461
2023-07-15 10:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table220
2023-07-15 10:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table462
2023-07-15 10:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table221
2023-07-15 10:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table463
2023-07-15 10:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table222
2023-07-15 10:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table464
2023-07-15 10:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table223
2023-07-15 10:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table465
2023-07-15 10:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table224
2023-07-15 10:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table466
2023-07-15 10:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1320
2023-07-15 10:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table225
2023-07-15 10:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table467
2023-07-15 10:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1321
2023-07-15 10:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table226
2023-07-15 10:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table468
2023-07-15 10:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table227
2023-07-15 10:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table469
2023-07-15 10:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table228
2023-07-15 10:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table229
2023-07-15 10:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1322
2023-07-15 10:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1323
2023-07-15 10:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1324
2023-07-15 10:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1325
2023-07-15 10:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1326
2023-07-15 10:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1327
2023-07-15 10:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1328
2023-07-15 10:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table470
2023-07-15 10:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1329
2023-07-15 10:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table691
2023-07-15 10:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table691) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table450
2023-07-15 10:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table692
2023-07-15 10:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table692) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table451
2023-07-15 10:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table693
2023-07-15 10:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table693) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table210
2023-07-15 10:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table452
2023-07-15 10:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table694
2023-07-15 10:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table694) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table211
2023-07-15 10:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table453
2023-07-15 10:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table695
2023-07-15 10:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table695) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table212
2023-07-15 10:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table454
2023-07-15 10:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table696
2023-07-15 10:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table696) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table213
2023-07-15 10:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table455
2023-07-15 10:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table697
2023-07-15 10:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table697) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table214
2023-07-15 10:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table456
2023-07-15 10:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table698
2023-07-15 10:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table698) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1310
2023-07-15 10:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table215
2023-07-15 10:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table457
2023-07-15 10:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table699
2023-07-15 10:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table699) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table216
2023-07-15 10:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table458
2023-07-15 10:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table217
2023-07-15 10:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table459
2023-07-15 10:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table218
2023-07-15 10:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table219
2023-07-15 10:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1319
2023-07-15 10:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1311
2023-07-15 10:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1312
2023-07-15 10:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1313
2023-07-15 10:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1314
2023-07-15 10:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1315
2023-07-15 10:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1316
2023-07-15 10:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1317
2023-07-15 10:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1318
2023-07-15 10:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table196
2023-07-15 10:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table197
2023-07-15 10:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table198
2023-07-15 10:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table199
2023-07-15 10:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table163
2023-07-15 10:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table164
2023-07-15 10:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table165
2023-07-15 10:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table166
2023-07-15 10:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table167
2023-07-15 10:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table168
2023-07-15 10:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table169
2023-07-15 10:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table170
2023-07-15 10:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table171
2023-07-15 10:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table172
2023-07-15 10:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table173
2023-07-15 10:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-15 10:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table394
2023-07-15 10:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-15 10:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table395
2023-07-15 10:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-15 10:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table396
2023-07-15 10:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table155
2023-07-15 10:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table397
2023-07-15 10:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table156
2023-07-15 10:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table398
2023-07-15 10:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table157
2023-07-15 10:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table399
2023-07-15 10:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table158
2023-07-15 10:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table159
2023-07-15 10:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table160
2023-07-15 10:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table161
2023-07-15 10:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table162
2023-07-15 10:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table185
2023-07-15 10:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table186
2023-07-15 10:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table187
2023-07-15 10:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table188
2023-07-15 10:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table189
2023-07-15 10:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table190
2023-07-15 10:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table191
2023-07-15 10:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table192
2023-07-15 10:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table193
2023-07-15 10:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table194
2023-07-15 10:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table195
2023-07-15 10:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table174
2023-07-15 10:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table175
2023-07-15 10:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table176
2023-07-15 10:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table177
2023-07-15 10:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table178
2023-07-15 10:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table179
2023-07-15 10:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table180
2023-07-15 10:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table181
2023-07-15 10:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table182
2023-07-15 10:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table183
2023-07-15 10:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table184
2023-07-15 10:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table800
2023-07-15 10:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table800) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table801
2023-07-15 10:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table801) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table802
2023-07-15 10:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table802) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table803
2023-07-15 10:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table803) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table804
2023-07-15 10:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table804) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table805
2023-07-15 10:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table805) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table806
2023-07-15 10:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table806) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table807
2023-07-15 10:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table807) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table808
2023-07-15 10:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table808) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table809
2023-07-15 10:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table809) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table820
2023-07-15 10:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table820) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table821
2023-07-15 10:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table821) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table822
2023-07-15 10:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table822) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table823
2023-07-15 10:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table823) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table824
2023-07-15 10:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table824) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table825
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table825) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table826
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table826) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table827
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table827) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table828
2023-07-15 10:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table828) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table829
2023-07-15 10:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table829) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1193
2023-07-15 10:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1194
2023-07-15 10:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1195
2023-07-15 10:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1196
2023-07-15 10:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1197
2023-07-15 10:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1198
2023-07-15 10:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1199
2023-07-15 10:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table810
2023-07-15 10:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table810) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table811
2023-07-15 10:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table811) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table812
2023-07-15 10:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table812) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table813
2023-07-15 10:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table813) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table814
2023-07-15 10:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table814) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1190
2023-07-15 10:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table815
2023-07-15 10:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table815) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1191
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table816
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table816) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1192
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table817
2023-07-15 10:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table817) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table818
2023-07-15 10:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table818) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table819
2023-07-15 10:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table819) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1260
2023-07-15 10:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1261
2023-07-15 10:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table760
2023-07-15 10:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table760) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1020
2023-07-15 10:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1020) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1262
2023-07-15 10:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table761
2023-07-15 10:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table761) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1021
2023-07-15 10:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1021) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1263
2023-07-15 10:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table520
2023-07-15 10:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table520) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table762
2023-07-15 10:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table762) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1022
2023-07-15 10:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1022) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1264
2023-07-15 10:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table521
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table521) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table763
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table763) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1023
2023-07-15 10:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1023) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1265
2023-07-15 10:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table522
2023-07-15 10:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table522) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table764
2023-07-15 10:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table764) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1024
2023-07-15 10:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1024) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1266
2023-07-15 10:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table523
2023-07-15 10:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table523) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table765
2023-07-15 10:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table765) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table524
2023-07-15 10:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table524) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table766
2023-07-15 10:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table766) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table525
2023-07-15 10:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table525) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table767
2023-07-15 10:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table767) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table526
2023-07-15 10:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table526) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table768
2023-07-15 10:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table768) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table527
2023-07-15 10:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table527) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table769
2023-07-15 10:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table769) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table528
2023-07-15 10:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table528) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table529
2023-07-15 10:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table529) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-15 10:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-15 10:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-15 10:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-15 10:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1025
2023-07-15 10:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1025) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1267
2023-07-15 10:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-15 10:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1026
2023-07-15 10:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1026) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1268
2023-07-15 10:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-15 10:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1027
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1027) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1269
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1028
2023-07-15 10:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1028) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-15 10:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1029
2023-07-15 10:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1029) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-15 10:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-15 10:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table990
2023-07-15 10:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table990) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1250
2023-07-15 10:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table991
2023-07-15 10:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table991) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1251
2023-07-15 10:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table750
2023-07-15 10:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table750) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table992
2023-07-15 10:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table992) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1010
2023-07-15 10:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1010) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1252
2023-07-15 10:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table751
2023-07-15 10:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table751) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table993
2023-07-15 10:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table993) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1011
2023-07-15 10:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1011) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1253
2023-07-15 10:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table510
2023-07-15 10:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table510) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table752
2023-07-15 10:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table752) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table994
2023-07-15 10:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table994) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1012
2023-07-15 10:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1012) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1254
2023-07-15 10:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table511
2023-07-15 10:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table511) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table753
2023-07-15 10:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table753) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table995
2023-07-15 10:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table995) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1013
2023-07-15 10:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1013) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1255
2023-07-15 10:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table512
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table512) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table754
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table754) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table996
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table996) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table513
2023-07-15 10:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table513) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table755
2023-07-15 10:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table755) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table997
2023-07-15 10:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table997) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table514
2023-07-15 10:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table514) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table756
2023-07-15 10:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table756) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table998
2023-07-15 10:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table998) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table515
2023-07-15 10:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table515) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table757
2023-07-15 10:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table757) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table999
2023-07-15 10:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table999) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table516
2023-07-15 10:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table516) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table758
2023-07-15 10:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table758) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table517
2023-07-15 10:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table517) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table759
2023-07-15 10:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table759) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table518
2023-07-15 10:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table518) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table519
2023-07-15 10:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table519) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-15 10:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-15 10:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-15 10:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1014
2023-07-15 10:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1014) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1256
2023-07-15 10:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-15 10:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1015
2023-07-15 10:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1015) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1257
2023-07-15 10:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-15 10:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1016
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1016) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1258
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-15 10:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1017
2023-07-15 10:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1017) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1259
2023-07-15 10:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-15 10:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1018
2023-07-15 10:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1018) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-15 10:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1019
2023-07-15 10:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1019) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-15 10:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-15 10:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-15 10:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table780
2023-07-15 10:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table780) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table781
2023-07-15 10:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table781) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table540
2023-07-15 10:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table540) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table782
2023-07-15 10:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table782) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1240
2023-07-15 10:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table541
2023-07-15 10:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table541) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table783
2023-07-15 10:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table783) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1241
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table300
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table542
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table542) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table784
2023-07-15 10:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table784) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1000
2023-07-15 10:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1000) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1242
2023-07-15 10:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table301
2023-07-15 10:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table543
2023-07-15 10:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table543) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table785
2023-07-15 10:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table785) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1001
2023-07-15 10:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1001) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1243
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table302
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table544
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table544) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table786
2023-07-15 10:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table786) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1002
2023-07-15 10:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1002) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1244
2023-07-15 10:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table303
2023-07-15 10:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table545
2023-07-15 10:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table545) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table787
2023-07-15 10:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table787) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table304
2023-07-15 10:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table546
2023-07-15 10:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table546) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table788
2023-07-15 10:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table788) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table305
2023-07-15 10:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table547
2023-07-15 10:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table547) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table789
2023-07-15 10:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table789) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table306
2023-07-15 10:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table548
2023-07-15 10:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table548) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table307
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table549
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table549) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table308
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table309
2023-07-15 10:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-15 10:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1003
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1003) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1245
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-15 10:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1004
2023-07-15 10:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1004) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1246
2023-07-15 10:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-15 10:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1005
2023-07-15 10:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1005) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1247
2023-07-15 10:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-15 10:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1006
2023-07-15 10:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1006) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1248
2023-07-15 10:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-15 10:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1007
2023-07-15 10:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1007) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1249
2023-07-15 10:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1008
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1008) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1009
2023-07-15 10:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1009) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-15 10:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-15 10:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-15 10:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table770
2023-07-15 10:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table770) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table771
2023-07-15 10:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table771) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table530
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table530) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table772
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table772) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1230
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table531
2023-07-15 10:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table531) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table773
2023-07-15 10:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table773) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1231
2023-07-15 10:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table532
2023-07-15 10:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table532) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table774
2023-07-15 10:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table774) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1232
2023-07-15 10:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table533
2023-07-15 10:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table533) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table775
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table775) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1233
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table534
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table534) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table776
2023-07-15 10:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table776) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table535
2023-07-15 10:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table535) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table777
2023-07-15 10:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table777) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table536
2023-07-15 10:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table536) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table778
2023-07-15 10:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table778) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table537
2023-07-15 10:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table537) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table779
2023-07-15 10:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table779) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table538
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table538) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table539
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table539) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1234
2023-07-15 10:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-15 10:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1235
2023-07-15 10:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-15 10:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1236
2023-07-15 10:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-15 10:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1237
2023-07-15 10:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-15 10:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1238
2023-07-15 10:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1239
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1061
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1061) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1062
2023-07-15 10:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1062) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1063
2023-07-15 10:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1063) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1064
2023-07-15 10:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1064) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1065
2023-07-15 10:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1065) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table960
2023-07-15 10:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table960) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1066
2023-07-15 10:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1066) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table961
2023-07-15 10:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table961) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1067
2023-07-15 10:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1067) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table720
2023-07-15 10:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table720) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table962
2023-07-15 10:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table962) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1068
2023-07-15 10:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1068) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table721
2023-07-15 10:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table721) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table963
2023-07-15 10:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table963) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table722
2023-07-15 10:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table722) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table964
2023-07-15 10:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table964) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table723
2023-07-15 10:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table723) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table965
2023-07-15 10:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table965) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table724
2023-07-15 10:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table724) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table966
2023-07-15 10:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table966) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table725
2023-07-15 10:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table725) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table967
2023-07-15 10:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table967) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table726
2023-07-15 10:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table726) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table968
2023-07-15 10:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table968) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table727
2023-07-15 10:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table727) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table969
2023-07-15 10:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table969) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table728
2023-07-15 10:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table728) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1060
2023-07-15 10:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1060) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table729
2023-07-15 10:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table729) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1069
2023-07-15 10:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1069) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1050
2023-07-15 10:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1050) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1292
2023-07-15 10:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1051
2023-07-15 10:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1051) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1293
2023-07-15 10:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1052
2023-07-15 10:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1052) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1294
2023-07-15 10:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1053
2023-07-15 10:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1053) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1295
2023-07-15 10:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1054
2023-07-15 10:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1054) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1296
2023-07-15 10:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1055
2023-07-15 10:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1055) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1297
2023-07-15 10:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table950
2023-07-15 10:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table950) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1056
2023-07-15 10:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1056) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1298
2023-07-15 10:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table951
2023-07-15 10:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table951) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1057
2023-07-15 10:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1057) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1299
2023-07-15 10:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table710
2023-07-15 10:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table710) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table952
2023-07-15 10:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table952) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table711
2023-07-15 10:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table711) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table953
2023-07-15 10:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table953) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table712
2023-07-15 10:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table712) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table954
2023-07-15 10:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table954) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table713
2023-07-15 10:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table713) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table955
2023-07-15 10:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table955) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table714
2023-07-15 10:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table714) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table956
2023-07-15 10:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table956) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table715
2023-07-15 10:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table715) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table957
2023-07-15 10:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table957) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table716
2023-07-15 10:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table716) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table958
2023-07-15 10:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table958) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1290
2023-07-15 10:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table717
2023-07-15 10:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table717) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table959
2023-07-15 10:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table959) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1291
2023-07-15 10:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table718
2023-07-15 10:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table718) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table719
2023-07-15 10:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table719) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1058
2023-07-15 10:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1058) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1059
2023-07-15 10:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1059) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1281
2023-07-15 10:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1040
2023-07-15 10:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1040) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1282
2023-07-15 10:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1041
2023-07-15 10:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1041) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1283
2023-07-15 10:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table980
2023-07-15 10:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table980) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1042
2023-07-15 10:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1042) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1284
2023-07-15 10:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table981
2023-07-15 10:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table981) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1043
2023-07-15 10:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1043) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1285
2023-07-15 10:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table740
2023-07-15 10:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table740) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table982
2023-07-15 10:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table982) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1044
2023-07-15 10:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1044) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1286
2023-07-15 10:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table741
2023-07-15 10:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table741) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table983
2023-07-15 10:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table983) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1045
2023-07-15 10:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1045) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1287
2023-07-15 10:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table500
2023-07-15 10:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table500) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table742
2023-07-15 10:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table742) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table984
2023-07-15 10:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table984) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1046
2023-07-15 10:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1046) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1288
2023-07-15 10:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table501
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table501) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table743
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table743) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table985
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table985) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table502
2023-07-15 10:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table502) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table744
2023-07-15 10:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table744) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table986
2023-07-15 10:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table986) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table503
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table503) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table745
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table745) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table987
2023-07-15 10:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table987) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table504
2023-07-15 10:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table504) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table746
2023-07-15 10:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table746) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table988
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table988) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table505
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table505) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table747
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table747) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table989
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table989) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table506
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table506) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table748
2023-07-15 10:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table748) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table507
2023-07-15 10:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table507) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table749
2023-07-15 10:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table749) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table508
2023-07-15 10:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table508) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1280
2023-07-15 10:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table509
2023-07-15 10:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table509) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1047
2023-07-15 10:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1047) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1289
2023-07-15 10:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1048
2023-07-15 10:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1048) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1049
2023-07-15 10:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1049) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1270
2023-07-15 10:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1271
2023-07-15 10:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1030
2023-07-15 10:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1030) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1272
2023-07-15 10:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1031
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1031) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1273
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table970
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table970) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1032
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1032) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1274
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table971
2023-07-15 10:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table971) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1033
2023-07-15 10:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1033) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1275
2023-07-15 10:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table730
2023-07-15 10:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table730) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table972
2023-07-15 10:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table972) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1034
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1034) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1276
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table731
2023-07-15 10:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table731) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table973
2023-07-15 10:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table973) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1035
2023-07-15 10:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1035) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1277
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table732
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table732) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table974
2023-07-15 10:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table974) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table733
2023-07-15 10:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table733) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table975
2023-07-15 10:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table975) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table734
2023-07-15 10:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table734) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table976
2023-07-15 10:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table976) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table735
2023-07-15 10:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table735) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table977
2023-07-15 10:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table977) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table736
2023-07-15 10:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table736) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table978
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table978) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table737
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table737) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table979
2023-07-15 10:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table979) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table738
2023-07-15 10:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table738) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table739
2023-07-15 10:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table739) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1036
2023-07-15 10:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1036) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1278
2023-07-15 10:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1037
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1037) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1279
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1038
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1038) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1039
2023-07-15 10:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1039) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table361
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table362
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table363
2023-07-15 10:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-15 10:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table364
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-15 10:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table365
2023-07-15 10:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-15 10:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-15 10:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table366
2023-07-15 10:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-15 10:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-15 10:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table367
2023-07-15 10:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-15 10:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table368
2023-07-15 10:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1420
2023-07-15 10:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-15 10:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table369
2023-07-15 10:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-15 10:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-15 10:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1429
2023-07-15 10:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1421
2023-07-15 10:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1422
2023-07-15 10:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1423
2023-07-15 10:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1424
2023-07-15 10:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1425
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1426
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table370
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1427
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table371
2023-07-15 10:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1428
2023-07-15 10:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table350
2023-07-15 10:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table592
2023-07-15 10:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table592) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table351
2023-07-15 10:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table593
2023-07-15 10:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table593) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-15 10:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table352
2023-07-15 10:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table594
2023-07-15 10:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table594) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-15 10:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table353
2023-07-15 10:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table595
2023-07-15 10:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table595) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-15 10:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table354
2023-07-15 10:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table596
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table596) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table355
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table597
2023-07-15 10:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table597) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-15 10:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table356
2023-07-15 10:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table598
2023-07-15 10:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table598) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-15 10:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table357
2023-07-15 10:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table599
2023-07-15 10:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table599) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-15 10:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table358
2023-07-15 10:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-15 10:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table359
2023-07-15 10:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-15 10:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-15 10:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1418
2023-07-15 10:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1419
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1410
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1411
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1412
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1413
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1414
2023-07-15 10:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1415
2023-07-15 10:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1416
2023-07-15 10:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table360
2023-07-15 10:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1417
2023-07-15 10:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table383
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table384
2023-07-15 10:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-15 10:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table385
2023-07-15 10:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-15 10:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table386
2023-07-15 10:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table387
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table388
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table389
2023-07-15 10:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-15 10:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-15 10:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1407
2023-07-15 10:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1408
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1409
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1400
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1401
2023-07-15 10:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1402
2023-07-15 10:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table390
2023-07-15 10:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1403
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table391
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1404
2023-07-15 10:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-15 10:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table392
2023-07-15 10:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1405
2023-07-15 10:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-15 10:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table393
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1406
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table372
2023-07-15 10:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-15 10:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table373
2023-07-15 10:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-15 10:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table374
2023-07-15 10:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table375
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-15 10:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table376
2023-07-15 10:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-15 10:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table377
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table378
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-15 10:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table379
2023-07-15 10:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-15 10:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-15 10:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table380
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table381
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table382
2023-07-15 10:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-15 10:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table560
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table560) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table561
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table561) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table320
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table562
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table562) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table321
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table563
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table563) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table322
2023-07-15 10:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table564
2023-07-15 10:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table564) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1220
2023-07-15 10:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table323
2023-07-15 10:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table565
2023-07-15 10:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table565) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1221
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table324
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table566
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table566) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1222
2023-07-15 10:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table325
2023-07-15 10:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table567
2023-07-15 10:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table567) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table326
2023-07-15 10:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table568
2023-07-15 10:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table568) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table327
2023-07-15 10:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table569
2023-07-15 10:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table569) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table328
2023-07-15 10:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table329
2023-07-15 10:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1223
2023-07-15 10:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-15 10:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1224
2023-07-15 10:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-15 10:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1225
2023-07-15 10:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-15 10:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1226
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1227
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-15 10:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1228
2023-07-15 10:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-15 10:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1229
2023-07-15 10:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-15 10:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table790
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table790) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-15 10:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table791
2023-07-15 10:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table791) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-15 10:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table550
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table550) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table792
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table792) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table551
2023-07-15 10:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table551) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table793
2023-07-15 10:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table793) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table310
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table552
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table552) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table794
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table794) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table311
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table553
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table553) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table795
2023-07-15 10:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table795) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table312
2023-07-15 10:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table554
2023-07-15 10:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table554) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table796
2023-07-15 10:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table796) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1210
2023-07-15 10:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table313
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table555
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table555) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table797
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table797) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1211
2023-07-15 10:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table314
2023-07-15 10:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table556
2023-07-15 10:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table556) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table798
2023-07-15 10:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table798) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table315
2023-07-15 10:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table557
2023-07-15 10:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table557) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table799
2023-07-15 10:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table799) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table316
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table558
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table558) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table317
2023-07-15 10:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table559
2023-07-15 10:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table559) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table318
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table319
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1212
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1213
2023-07-15 10:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-15 10:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1214
2023-07-15 10:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1215
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1216
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1217
2023-07-15 10:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-15 10:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1218
2023-07-15 10:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-15 10:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1219
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table581
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table581) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-15 10:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table340
2023-07-15 10:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table582
2023-07-15 10:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table582) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table341
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table583
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table583) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table342
2023-07-15 10:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table584
2023-07-15 10:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table584) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table343
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table585
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table585) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table344
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table586
2023-07-15 10:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table586) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-15 10:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table345
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table587
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table587) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table346
2023-07-15 10:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table588
2023-07-15 10:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table588) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1200
2023-07-15 10:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-15 10:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table347
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table589
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table589) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table348
2023-07-15 10:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-15 10:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table349
2023-07-15 10:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1209
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1201
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1202
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1203
2023-07-15 10:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-15 10:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1204
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1205
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1206
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table590
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table590) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1207
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table591
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table591) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1208
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-15 10:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table570
2023-07-15 10:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table570) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-15 10:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table571
2023-07-15 10:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table571) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-15 10:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table330
2023-07-15 10:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table572
2023-07-15 10:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table572) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-15 10:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table331
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table573
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table573) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table332
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table574
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table574) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table333
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table575
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table575) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table334
2023-07-15 10:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table576
2023-07-15 10:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table576) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1430
2023-07-15 10:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table335
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table577
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table577) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1431
2023-07-15 10:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table336
2023-07-15 10:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table578
2023-07-15 10:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table578) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table337
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table579
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table579) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table338
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table339
2023-07-15 10:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-15 10:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-15 10:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-15 10:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-15 10:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table580
2023-07-15 10:53:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table580) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table284
2023-07-15 10:53:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table285
2023-07-15 10:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table286
2023-07-15 10:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table287
2023-07-15 10:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table288
2023-07-15 10:53:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table289
2023-07-15 10:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table290
2023-07-15 10:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table291
2023-07-15 10:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table292
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table293
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table294
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table273
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table274
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table275
2023-07-15 10:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table276
2023-07-15 10:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table277
2023-07-15 10:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table278
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table279
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table280
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table281
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table282
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table283
2023-07-15 10:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table295
2023-07-15 10:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table296
2023-07-15 10:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table297
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table298
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table299
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table920
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table920) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table921
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table921) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table922
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table922) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table923
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table923) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table924
2023-07-15 10:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table924) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table925
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table925) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table926
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table926) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table927
2023-07-15 10:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table927) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table928
2023-07-15 10:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table928) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table929
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table929) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1094
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1094) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1095
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1095) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1096
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1096) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1097
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1097) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1098
2023-07-15 10:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1098) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1099
2023-07-15 10:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1099) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table910
2023-07-15 10:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table910) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table911
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table911) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table912
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table912) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1090
2023-07-15 10:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1090) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table913
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table913) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1091
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1091) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table914
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table914) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1092
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1092) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table915
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table915) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1093
2023-07-15 10:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1093) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table916
2023-07-15 10:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table916) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table917
2023-07-15 10:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table917) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table918
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table918) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table919
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table919) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1083
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1083) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1084
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1084) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1085
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1085) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1086
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1086) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1087
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1087) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1088
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1088) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1089
2023-07-15 10:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1089) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table940
2023-07-15 10:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table940) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table941
2023-07-15 10:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table941) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table700
2023-07-15 10:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table700) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table942
2023-07-15 10:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table942) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table701
2023-07-15 10:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table701) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table943
2023-07-15 10:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table943) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table702
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table702) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table944
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table944) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table703
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table703) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table945
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table945) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table704
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table704) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table946
2023-07-15 10:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table946) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1080
2023-07-15 10:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1080) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table705
2023-07-15 10:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table705) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table947
2023-07-15 10:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table947) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1081
2023-07-15 10:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1081) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table706
2023-07-15 10:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table706) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table948
2023-07-15 10:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table948) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1082
2023-07-15 10:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1082) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table707
2023-07-15 10:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table707) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table949
2023-07-15 10:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table949) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table708
2023-07-15 10:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table708) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table709
2023-07-15 10:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table709) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1072
2023-07-15 10:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1072) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1073
2023-07-15 10:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1073) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1074
2023-07-15 10:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1074) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1075
2023-07-15 10:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1075) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1076
2023-07-15 10:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1076) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1077
2023-07-15 10:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1077) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1078
2023-07-15 10:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1078) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1079
2023-07-15 10:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1079) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table930
2023-07-15 10:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table930) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table931
2023-07-15 10:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table931) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table932
2023-07-15 10:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table932) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table933
2023-07-15 10:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table933) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table934
2023-07-15 10:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table934) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table935
2023-07-15 10:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table935) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table936
2023-07-15 10:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table936) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1070
2023-07-15 10:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1070) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table937
2023-07-15 10:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table937) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1071
2023-07-15 10:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1071) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table938
2023-07-15 10:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table938) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table939
2023-07-15 10:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table939) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table900
2023-07-15 10:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table900) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table901
2023-07-15 10:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table901) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table902
2023-07-15 10:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table902) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table903
2023-07-15 10:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table903) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table904
2023-07-15 10:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table904) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table905
2023-07-15 10:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table905) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table906
2023-07-15 10:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table906) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table907
2023-07-15 10:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table907) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table908
2023-07-15 10:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table908) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table909
2023-07-15 10:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv845935312=1, srv1093162334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table909) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-15 10:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-15 10:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-15 10:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-15 10:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-15 10:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-15 10:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-15 10:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-15 10:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-15 10:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-15 10:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-15 10:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-15 10:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-15 10:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-15 10:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-15 10:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-15 10:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-15 10:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-15 10:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-15 10:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-15 10:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-15 10:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-15 10:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-15 10:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-15 10:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-15 10:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-15 10:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-15 10:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-15 10:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-15 10:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-15 10:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-15 10:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-15 10:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-15 10:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv385904815=0, srv944679908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2146955879=1, srv224145697=2, srv1002703549=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2146955879=1, srv224145697=2, srv1002703549=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1093504804=0, srv855135288=2, srv1523021492=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1093504804=0, srv855135288=2, srv1523021492=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1093504804=0, srv855135288=2, srv1523021492=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv435006420=1, srv120094761=0, srv61459557=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv435006420=1, srv120094761=0, srv61459557=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1846762501=0, srv1972012919=1, srv224220990=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1846762501=0, srv1972012919=1, srv224220990=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1846762501=0, srv1972012919=1, srv224220990=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv115562131=0, srv2134686738=1, srv927581987=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv115562131=0, srv2134686738=1, srv927581987=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv115562131=0, srv2134686738=1, srv927581987=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv115562131=0, srv2134686738=1, srv927581987=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-15 10:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-15 10:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-15 10:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-15 10:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-15 10:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-15 10:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1542921548=0, srv462102200=2, srv305679605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1150431486=0, srv629245726=2, srv701613755=3, srv487585910=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1150431486=0, srv629245726=2, srv701613755=3, srv487585910=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1150431486=0, srv629245726=2, srv701613755=3, srv487585910=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv165880038=0, srv1992523148=2, srv1665608795=1, srv754826471=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv165880038=0, srv1992523148=2, srv1665608795=1, srv754826471=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv165880038=0, srv1992523148=2, srv1665608795=1, srv754826471=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv165880038=0, srv1992523148=2, srv1665608795=1, srv754826471=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1193947582=1, srv1753547898=2, srv1935254608=3, srv1132742794=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1193947582=1, srv1753547898=2, srv1935254608=3, srv1132742794=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1193947582=1, srv1753547898=2, srv1935254608=3, srv1132742794=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1193947582=1, srv1753547898=2, srv1935254608=3, srv1132742794=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1193947582=1, srv1753547898=2, srv1935254608=3, srv1132742794=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1410209192=1, srv1964597859=2, srv1290639809=0, srv889346878=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1410209192=1, srv1964597859=2, srv1290639809=0, srv889346878=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1410209192=1, srv1964597859=2, srv1290639809=0, srv889346878=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1410209192=1, srv1964597859=2, srv1290639809=0, srv889346878=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1410209192=1, srv1964597859=2, srv1290639809=0, srv889346878=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1410209192=1, srv1964597859=2, srv1290639809=0, srv889346878=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1761486976=0, srv245134494=2, srv1897034142=1, srv868679634=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1761486976=0, srv245134494=2, srv1897034142=1, srv868679634=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1761486976=0, srv245134494=2, srv1897034142=1, srv868679634=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1761486976=0, srv245134494=2, srv1897034142=1, srv868679634=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1761486976=0, srv245134494=2, srv1897034142=1, srv868679634=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1761486976=0, srv245134494=2, srv1897034142=1, srv868679634=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1600567196=0, srv30861358=2, srv1634327200=1, srv465614950=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1600567196=0, srv30861358=2, srv1634327200=1, srv465614950=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1600567196=0, srv30861358=2, srv1634327200=1, srv465614950=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1600567196=0, srv30861358=2, srv1634327200=1, srv465614950=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1600567196=0, srv30861358=2, srv1634327200=1, srv465614950=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1600567196=0, srv30861358=2, srv1634327200=1, srv465614950=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv883882876=3, srv2138678792=2, srv1919500184=1, srv1743037106=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv883882876=3, srv2138678792=2, srv1919500184=1, srv1743037106=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv883882876=3, srv2138678792=2, srv1919500184=1, srv1743037106=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv883882876=3, srv2138678792=2, srv1919500184=1, srv1743037106=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv883882876=3, srv2138678792=2, srv1919500184=1, srv1743037106=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv883882876=3, srv2138678792=2, srv1919500184=1, srv1743037106=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2002642719=0, srv504749838=2, srv208991868=1, srv611382164=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2002642719=0, srv504749838=2, srv208991868=1, srv611382164=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2002642719=0, srv504749838=2, srv208991868=1, srv611382164=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2002642719=0, srv504749838=2, srv208991868=1, srv611382164=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2002642719=0, srv504749838=2, srv208991868=1, srv611382164=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2002642719=0, srv504749838=2, srv208991868=1, srv611382164=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2002642719=0, srv504749838=2, srv208991868=1, srv611382164=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv944435103=3, srv2066165535=1, srv2048539050=0, srv583045433=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv944435103=3, srv2066165535=1, srv2048539050=0, srv583045433=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv944435103=3, srv2066165535=1, srv2048539050=0, srv583045433=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv944435103=3, srv2066165535=1, srv2048539050=0, srv583045433=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv944435103=3, srv2066165535=1, srv2048539050=0, srv583045433=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv944435103=3, srv2066165535=1, srv2048539050=0, srv583045433=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv944435103=3, srv2066165535=1, srv2048539050=0, srv583045433=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv944435103=3, srv2066165535=1, srv2048539050=0, srv583045433=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1280223013=0, srv806033283=3, srv1924920023=2, srv1817716449=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1280223013=0, srv806033283=3, srv1924920023=2, srv1817716449=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1280223013=0, srv806033283=3, srv1924920023=2, srv1817716449=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1280223013=0, srv806033283=3, srv1924920023=2, srv1817716449=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1280223013=0, srv806033283=3, srv1924920023=2, srv1817716449=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1280223013=0, srv806033283=3, srv1924920023=2, srv1817716449=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1280223013=0, srv806033283=3, srv1924920023=2, srv1817716449=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1034899752=0, srv1809338568=3, srv1569889548=2, srv844953353=4, srv1141453745=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1034899752=0, srv1809338568=3, srv1569889548=2, srv844953353=4, srv1141453745=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1034899752=0, srv1809338568=3, srv1569889548=2, srv844953353=4, srv1141453745=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1034899752=0, srv1809338568=3, srv1569889548=2, srv844953353=4, srv1141453745=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1380
2023-07-15 10:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1381
2023-07-15 10:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table880
2023-07-15 10:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table880) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1140
2023-07-15 10:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1382
2023-07-15 10:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table881
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table881) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1141
2023-07-15 10:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1383
2023-07-15 10:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table640
2023-07-15 10:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table640) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table882
2023-07-15 10:53:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table882) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1142
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1384
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table641
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table641) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table883
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table883) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1143
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1385
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table400
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table642
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table642) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table884
2023-07-15 10:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table884) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1144
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1386
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table401
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table643
2023-07-15 10:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table643) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table885
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table885) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1145
2023-07-15 10:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1387
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table402
2023-07-15 10:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table644
2023-07-15 10:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table644) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table886
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table886) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table403
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table645
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table645) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table887
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table887) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table404
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table646
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table646) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table888
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table888) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table405
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table647
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table647) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table889
2023-07-15 10:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table889) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table406
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table648
2023-07-15 10:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table648) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table407
2023-07-15 10:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table649
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table649) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table408
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table409
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1146
2023-07-15 10:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1388
2023-07-15 10:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1147
2023-07-15 10:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1389
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1148
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1149
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1370
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1371
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table870
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table870) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1130
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1372
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table871
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table871) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1131
2023-07-15 10:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1373
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table630
2023-07-15 10:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table630) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table872
2023-07-15 10:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table872) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1132
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1374
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table631
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table631) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table873
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table873) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1133
2023-07-15 10:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1375
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table632
2023-07-15 10:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table632) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table874
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table874) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1134
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1376
2023-07-15 10:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table633
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table633) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table875
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table875) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table634
2023-07-15 10:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table634) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table876
2023-07-15 10:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table876) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table635
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table635) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table877
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table877) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table636
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table636) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table878
2023-07-15 10:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table878) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table637
2023-07-15 10:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table637) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table879
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table879) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table638
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table638) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table639
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table639) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1135
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1377
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1136
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1378
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1137
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1379
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1138
2023-07-15 10:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1139
2023-07-15 10:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table660
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table660) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1360
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table661
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table661) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1361
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table420
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table662
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table662) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1120
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1362
2023-07-15 10:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table421
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table663
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table663) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1121
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1363
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table422
2023-07-15 10:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table664
2023-07-15 10:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table664) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1122
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1364
2023-07-15 10:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table423
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table665
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table665) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1123
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1365
2023-07-15 10:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table424
2023-07-15 10:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table666
2023-07-15 10:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table666) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table425
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table667
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table667) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table426
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table668
2023-07-15 10:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table668) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table427
2023-07-15 10:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table669
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table669) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table428
2023-07-15 10:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table429
2023-07-15 10:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1124
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1366
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1125
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1367
2023-07-15 10:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1126
2023-07-15 10:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1368
2023-07-15 10:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1127
2023-07-15 10:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1369
2023-07-15 10:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1128
2023-07-15 10:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1129
2023-07-15 10:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table890
2023-07-15 10:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table890) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table891
2023-07-15 10:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table891) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table650
2023-07-15 10:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table650) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table892
2023-07-15 10:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table892) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1350
2023-07-15 10:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table651
2023-07-15 10:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table651) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table893
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table893) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1351
2023-07-15 10:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table410
2023-07-15 10:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table652
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table652) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table894
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table894) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1110
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1352
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table411
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table653
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table653) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table895
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table895) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1111
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1353
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table412
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table654
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table654) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table896
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table896) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1112
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1354
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table413
2023-07-15 10:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table655
2023-07-15 10:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table655) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table897
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table897) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table414
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table656
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table656) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table898
2023-07-15 10:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table898) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table415
2023-07-15 10:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table657
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table657) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table899
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table899) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table416
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table658
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table658) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table417
2023-07-15 10:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table659
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table659) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table418
2023-07-15 10:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table419
2023-07-15 10:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1113
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1355
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1114
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1356
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1115
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1357
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1116
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1358
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1117
2023-07-15 10:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1359
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1118
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1119
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1182
2023-07-15 10:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1183
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1184
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1185
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1186
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1187
2023-07-15 10:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table840
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table840) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1188
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table841
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table841) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1189
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table600
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table600) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table842
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table842) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table601
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table601) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table843
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table843) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table602
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table602) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table844
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table844) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table603
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table603) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table845
2023-07-15 10:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table845) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table604
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table604) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table846
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table846) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table605
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table605) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table847
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table847) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table606
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table606) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table848
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table848) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1180
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table607
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table607) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table849
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table849) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1181
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table608
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table608) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table609
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table609) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1171
2023-07-15 10:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1172
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1173
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1174
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1175
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1176
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1177
2023-07-15 10:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table830
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table830) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1178
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table831
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table831) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table832
2023-07-15 10:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table832) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table833
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table833) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table834
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table834) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table835
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table835) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table836
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table836) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table837
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table837) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table838
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table838) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1170
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table839
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table839) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1179
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1160
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1161
2023-07-15 10:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1162
2023-07-15 10:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1163
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table860
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table860) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1164
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table861
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table861) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1165
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table620
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table620) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table862
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table862) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1166
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table621
2023-07-15 10:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table621) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table863
2023-07-15 10:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table863) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1167
2023-07-15 10:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table622
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table622) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table864
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table864) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table623
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table623) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table865
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table865) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table624
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table624) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table866
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table866) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table625
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table625) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table867
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table867) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table626
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table626) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table868
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table868) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table627
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table627) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table869
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table869) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table628
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table628) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table629
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table629) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1168
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1169
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1391
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1150
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1392
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1151
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1393
2023-07-15 10:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1152
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1394
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1153
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1395
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table850
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table850) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1154
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1396
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table851
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table851) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1155
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1397
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table610
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table610) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table852
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table852) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1156
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1398
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table611
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table611) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table853
2023-07-15 10:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table853) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table612
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table612) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table854
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table854) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table613
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table613) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table855
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table855) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table614
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table614) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table856
2023-07-15 10:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table856) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table615
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table615) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table857
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table857) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table616
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table616) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table858
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table858) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table617
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table617) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table859
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table859) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table618
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table618) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1390
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table619
2023-07-15 10:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table619) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1157
2023-07-15 10:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1399
2023-07-15 10:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1158
2023-07-15 10:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1159
2023-07-15 10:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table240
2023-07-15 10:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table482
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table241
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table483
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table242
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table484
2023-07-15 10:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table243
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table485
2023-07-15 10:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table244
2023-07-15 10:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table486
2023-07-15 10:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table245
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table487
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table246
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table488
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table247
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table489
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table248
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table249
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1308
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1309
2023-07-15 10:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1300
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1301
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1302
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1303
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1304
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table490
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1305
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table491
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1306
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table250
2023-07-15 10:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table492
2023-07-15 10:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1307
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table471
2023-07-15 10:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table230
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table472
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table231
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table473
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table232
2023-07-15 10:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table474
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table233
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table475
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table234
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table476
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table235
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table477
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table236
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table478
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table237
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table479
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table238
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table239
2023-07-15 10:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table480
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table481
2023-07-15 10:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table262
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table263
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table264
2023-07-15 10:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table265
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table266
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table267
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table268
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table269
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table270
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table271
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table272
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table251
2023-07-15 10:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table493
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table252
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table494
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table253
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table495
2023-07-15 10:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table254
2023-07-15 10:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table496
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table255
2023-07-15 10:53:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table497
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table256
2023-07-15 10:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table498
2023-07-15 10:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table257
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table499
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table258
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table259
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table260
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table261
2023-07-15 10:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table680
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table680) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table681
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table681) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table440
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table682
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table682) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table441
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table683
2023-07-15 10:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table683) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table200
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table442
2023-07-15 10:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table684
2023-07-15 10:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table684) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1340
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table201
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table443
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table685
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table685) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1341
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table202
2023-07-15 10:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table444
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table686
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table686) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1100
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1342
2023-07-15 10:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table203
2023-07-15 10:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table445
2023-07-15 10:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table687
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table687) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1101
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1343
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table204
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table446
2023-07-15 10:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table688
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table688) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table205
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table447
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table689
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table689) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table206
2023-07-15 10:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table448
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table207
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table449
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table208
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table209
2023-07-15 10:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1102
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1344
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1103
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1345
2023-07-15 10:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1104
2023-07-15 10:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1346
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1105
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1347
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1106
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1348
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1107
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1349
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1108
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table690
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table690) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1109
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table670
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table670) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table671
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table671) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table430
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table672
2023-07-15 10:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table672) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table431
2023-07-15 10:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table673
2023-07-15 10:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table673) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table432
2023-07-15 10:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table674
2023-07-15 10:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table674) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1330
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table433
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table675
2023-07-15 10:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table675) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1331
2023-07-15 10:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table434
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table676
2023-07-15 10:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table676) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1332
2023-07-15 10:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table435
2023-07-15 10:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table677
2023-07-15 10:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table677) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table436
2023-07-15 10:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table678
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table678) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table437
2023-07-15 10:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table679
2023-07-15 10:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table679) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table438
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table439
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1333
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1334
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1335
2023-07-15 10:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1336
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1337
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1338
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1339
2023-07-15 10:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table460
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table461
2023-07-15 10:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table220
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table462
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table221
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table463
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table222
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table464
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table223
2023-07-15 10:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table465
2023-07-15 10:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table224
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table466
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1320
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table225
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table467
2023-07-15 10:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1321
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table226
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table468
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table227
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table469
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table228
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table229
2023-07-15 10:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1322
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1323
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1324
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1325
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1326
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1327
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1328
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table470
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1329
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table691
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table691) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table450
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table692
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table692) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table451
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table693
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table693) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table210
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table452
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table694
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table694) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table211
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table453
2023-07-15 10:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table695
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table695) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table212
2023-07-15 10:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table454
2023-07-15 10:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table696
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table696) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table213
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table455
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table697
2023-07-15 10:53:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table697) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table214
2023-07-15 10:53:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table456
2023-07-15 10:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table698
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table698) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1310
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table215
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table457
2023-07-15 10:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table699
2023-07-15 10:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table699) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table216
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table458
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table217
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table459
2023-07-15 10:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table218
2023-07-15 10:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table219
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1319
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1311
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1312
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1313
2023-07-15 10:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1314
2023-07-15 10:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1315
2023-07-15 10:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1316
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1317
2023-07-15 10:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1318
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table196
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table197
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table198
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table199
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table163
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table164
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table165
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table166
2023-07-15 10:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table167
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table168
2023-07-15 10:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table169
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table170
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table171
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table172
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table173
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table394
2023-07-15 10:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-15 10:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table395
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table396
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table155
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table397
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table156
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table398
2023-07-15 10:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table157
2023-07-15 10:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table399
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table158
2023-07-15 10:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table159
2023-07-15 10:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table160
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table161
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table162
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table185
2023-07-15 10:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table186
2023-07-15 10:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table187
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table188
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table189
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table190
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table191
2023-07-15 10:53:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table192
2023-07-15 10:53:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table193
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table194
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table195
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table174
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table175
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table176
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table177
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table178
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table179
2023-07-15 10:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table180
2023-07-15 10:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table181
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table182
2023-07-15 10:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table183
2023-07-15 10:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table184
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table800
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table800) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table801
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table801) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table802
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table802) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table803
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table803) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table804
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table804) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table805
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table805) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table806
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table806) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table807
2023-07-15 10:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table807) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table808
2023-07-15 10:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table808) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table809
2023-07-15 10:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table809) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table820
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table820) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table821
2023-07-15 10:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table821) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table822
2023-07-15 10:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table822) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table823
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table823) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table824
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table824) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table825
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table825) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table826
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table826) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table827
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table827) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table828
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table828) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table829
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table829) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1193
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1194
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1195
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1196
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1197
2023-07-15 10:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1198
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1199
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table810
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table810) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table811
2023-07-15 10:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table811) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table812
2023-07-15 10:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table812) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table813
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table813) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table814
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table814) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1190
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table815
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table815) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1191
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table816
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table816) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1192
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table817
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table817) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table818
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table818) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table819
2023-07-15 10:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table819) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1260
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1261
2023-07-15 10:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table760
2023-07-15 10:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table760) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1020
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1020) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1262
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table761
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table761) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1021
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1021) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1263
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table520
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table520) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table762
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table762) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1022
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1022) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1264
2023-07-15 10:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table521
2023-07-15 10:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table521) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table763
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table763) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1023
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1023) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1265
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table522
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table522) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table764
2023-07-15 10:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table764) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1024
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1024) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1266
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table523
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table523) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table765
2023-07-15 10:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table765) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table524
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table524) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table766
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table766) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table525
2023-07-15 10:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table525) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table767
2023-07-15 10:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table767) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table526
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table526) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table768
2023-07-15 10:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table768) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table527
2023-07-15 10:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table527) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table769
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table769) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table528
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table528) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table529
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table529) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-15 10:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-15 10:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1025
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1025) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1267
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1026
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1026) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1268
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1027
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1027) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1269
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1028
2023-07-15 10:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1028) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-15 10:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1029
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1029) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1490
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1491
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table990
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table990) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1250
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1492
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table991
2023-07-15 10:53:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table991) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1251
2023-07-15 10:53:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1493
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table750
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table750) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table992
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table992) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1010
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1010) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1252
2023-07-15 10:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1494
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table751
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table751) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table993
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table993) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1011
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1011) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1253
2023-07-15 10:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1495
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table510
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table510) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table752
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table752) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table994
2023-07-15 10:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table994) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1012
2023-07-15 10:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1012) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1254
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1496
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table511
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table511) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table753
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table753) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table995
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table995) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1013
2023-07-15 10:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1013) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1255
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1497
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table512
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table512) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table754
2023-07-15 10:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table754) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table996
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table996) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table513
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table513) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table755
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table755) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table997
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table997) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table514
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table514) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table756
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table756) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table998
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table998) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table515
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table515) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table757
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table757) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table999
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table999) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table516
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table516) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table758
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table758) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table517
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table517) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table759
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table759) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table518
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table518) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table519
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table519) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-15 10:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-15 10:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1014
2023-07-15 10:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1014) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1256
2023-07-15 10:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1498
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-15 10:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1015
2023-07-15 10:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1015) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1257
2023-07-15 10:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1499
2023-07-15 10:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-15 10:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1016
2023-07-15 10:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1016) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1258
2023-07-15 10:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-15 10:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1017
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1017) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1259
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1018
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1018) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-15 10:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1019
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1019) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-15 10:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table780
2023-07-15 10:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table780) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1480
2023-07-15 10:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table781
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table781) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1481
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table540
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table540) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table782
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table782) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1240
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1482
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table541
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table541) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table783
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table783) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1241
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1483
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table300
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table542
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table542) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table784
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table784) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1000
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1000) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1242
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1484
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table301
2023-07-15 10:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table543
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table543) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table785
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table785) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1001
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1001) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1243
2023-07-15 10:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1485
2023-07-15 10:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table302
2023-07-15 10:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table544
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table544) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table786
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table786) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1002
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1002) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1244
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1486
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table303
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table545
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table545) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table787
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table787) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table304
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table546
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table546) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table788
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table788) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table305
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table547
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table547) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table789
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table789) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table306
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table548
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table548) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table307
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table549
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table549) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table308
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table309
2023-07-15 10:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1003
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1003) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1245
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1487
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1004
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1004) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1246
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1488
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1005
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1005) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1247
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1489
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1006
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1006) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1248
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1007
2023-07-15 10:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1007) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1249
2023-07-15 10:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1008
2023-07-15 10:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1008) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-15 10:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1009
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1009) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-15 10:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-15 10:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table770
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table770) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1470
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table771
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table771) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1471
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table530
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table530) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table772
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table772) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1230
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1472
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table531
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table531) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table773
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table773) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1231
2023-07-15 10:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1473
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table532
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table532) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table774
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table774) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1232
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1474
2023-07-15 10:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table533
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table533) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table775
2023-07-15 10:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table775) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1233
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1475
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table534
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table534) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table776
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table776) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table535
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table535) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table777
2023-07-15 10:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table777) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table536
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table536) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table778
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table778) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table537
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table537) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table779
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table779) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table538
2023-07-15 10:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table538) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table539
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table539) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1234
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1476
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1235
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1477
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1236
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1478
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-15 10:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1237
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1479
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1238
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1239
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1061
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1061) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1062
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1062) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1063
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1063) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1064
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1064) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1065
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1065) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table960
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table960) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1066
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1066) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table961
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table961) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1067
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1067) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table720
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table720) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table962
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table962) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1068
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1068) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table721
2023-07-15 10:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table721) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table963
2023-07-15 10:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table963) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table722
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table722) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table964
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table964) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table723
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table723) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table965
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table965) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table724
2023-07-15 10:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table724) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table966
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table966) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table725
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table725) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table967
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table967) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table726
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table726) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table968
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table968) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table727
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table727) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table969
2023-07-15 10:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table969) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table728
2023-07-15 10:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table728) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1060
2023-07-15 10:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1060) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table729
2023-07-15 10:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table729) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1069
2023-07-15 10:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1069) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1050
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1050) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1292
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1051
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1051) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1293
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1052
2023-07-15 10:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1052) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1294
2023-07-15 10:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1053
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1053) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1295
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1054
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1054) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1296
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1055
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1055) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1297
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table950
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table950) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1056
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1056) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1298
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table951
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table951) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1057
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1057) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1299
2023-07-15 10:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table710
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table710) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table952
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table952) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table711
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table711) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table953
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table953) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table712
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table712) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table954
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table954) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table713
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table713) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table955
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table955) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table714
2023-07-15 10:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table714) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table956
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table956) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table715
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table715) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table957
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table957) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table716
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table716) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table958
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table958) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1290
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table717
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table717) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table959
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table959) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1291
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table718
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table718) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table719
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table719) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1058
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1058) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1059
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1059) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1281
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1040
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1040) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1282
2023-07-15 10:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1041
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1041) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1283
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table980
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table980) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1042
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1042) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1284
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table981
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table981) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1043
2023-07-15 10:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1043) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1285
2023-07-15 10:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table740
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table740) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table982
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table982) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1044
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1044) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1286
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table741
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table741) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table983
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table983) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1045
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1045) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1287
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table500
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table500) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table742
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table742) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table984
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table984) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1046
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1046) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1288
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table501
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table501) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table743
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table743) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table985
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table985) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table502
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table502) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table744
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table744) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table986
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table986) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table503
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table503) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table745
2023-07-15 10:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table745) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table987
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table987) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table504
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table504) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table746
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table746) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table988
2023-07-15 10:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table988) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table505
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table505) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table747
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table747) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table989
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table989) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table506
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table506) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table748
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table748) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table507
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table507) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table749
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table749) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table508
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table508) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1280
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table509
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table509) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1047
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1047) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1289
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1048
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1048) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1049
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1049) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1270
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1271
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1030
2023-07-15 10:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1030) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1272
2023-07-15 10:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1031
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1031) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1273
2023-07-15 10:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table970
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table970) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1032
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1032) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1274
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table971
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table971) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1033
2023-07-15 10:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1033) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1275
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table730
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table730) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table972
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table972) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1034
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1034) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1276
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table731
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table731) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table973
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table973) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1035
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1035) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1277
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table732
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table732) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table974
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table974) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table733
2023-07-15 10:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table733) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table975
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table975) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table734
2023-07-15 10:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table734) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table976
2023-07-15 10:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table976) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table735
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table735) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table977
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table977) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table736
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table736) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table978
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table978) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table737
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table737) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table979
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table979) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table738
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table738) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table739
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table739) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1036
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1036) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1278
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1037
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1037) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1279
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1038
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1038) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1039
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1039) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table361
2023-07-15 10:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table362
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-15 10:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table363
2023-07-15 10:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-15 10:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table364
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table365
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table366
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-15 10:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table367
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-15 10:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table368
2023-07-15 10:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1420
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-15 10:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table369
2023-07-15 10:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-15 10:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-15 10:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1429
2023-07-15 10:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1421
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1422
2023-07-15 10:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1423
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1424
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1425
2023-07-15 10:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1426
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table370
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1427
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table371
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1428
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table350
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table592
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table592) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table351
2023-07-15 10:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table593
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table593) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table352
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table594
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table594) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-15 10:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table353
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table595
2023-07-15 10:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table595) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-15 10:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table354
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table596
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table596) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table355
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table597
2023-07-15 10:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table597) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table356
2023-07-15 10:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table598
2023-07-15 10:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table598) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table357
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table599
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table599) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table358
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table359
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1418
2023-07-15 10:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1419
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1410
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1411
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1412
2023-07-15 10:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1413
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1414
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1415
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1416
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table360
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1417
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table383
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table384
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table385
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-15 10:53:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table386
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table387
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table388
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table389
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-15 10:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1407
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1408
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1409
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1400
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1401
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1402
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table390
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1403
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table391
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1404
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table392
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1405
2023-07-15 10:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-15 10:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table393
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1406
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table372
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table373
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table374
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table375
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table376
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table377
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table378
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table379
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-15 10:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table380
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table381
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table382
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table560
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table560) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table561
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table561) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table320
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table562
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table562) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1460
2023-07-15 10:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table321
2023-07-15 10:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table563
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table563) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1461
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table322
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table564
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table564) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1220
2023-07-15 10:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1462
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table323
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table565
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table565) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1221
2023-07-15 10:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1463
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table324
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table566
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table566) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1222
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1464
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table325
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table567
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table567) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table326
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table568
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table568) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table327
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table569
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table569) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table328
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table329
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1223
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1465
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1224
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1466
2023-07-15 10:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-15 10:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1225
2023-07-15 10:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1467
2023-07-15 10:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-15 10:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1226
2023-07-15 10:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1468
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1227
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1469
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1228
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1229
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-15 10:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table790
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table790) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table791
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table791) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table550
2023-07-15 10:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table550) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table792
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table792) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table551
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table551) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table793
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table793) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table310
2023-07-15 10:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table552
2023-07-15 10:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table552) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table794
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table794) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1450
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table311
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table553
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table553) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table795
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table795) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1451
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table312
2023-07-15 10:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table554
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table554) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table796
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table796) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1210
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1452
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table313
2023-07-15 10:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table555
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table555) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table797
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table797) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1211
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1453
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table314
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table556
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table556) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table798
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table798) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table315
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table557
2023-07-15 10:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table557) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table799
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table799) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table316
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table558
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table558) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table317
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table559
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table559) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table318
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table319
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1212
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1454
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1213
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1455
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1214
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1456
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1215
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1457
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1216
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1458
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-15 10:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1217
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1459
2023-07-15 10:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1218
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1219
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table581
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table581) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table340
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table582
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table582) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table341
2023-07-15 10:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table583
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table583) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-15 10:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-15 10:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table342
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table584
2023-07-15 10:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table584) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-15 10:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table343
2023-07-15 10:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table585
2023-07-15 10:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table585) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table344
2023-07-15 10:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table586
2023-07-15 10:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table586) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1440
2023-07-15 10:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-15 10:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table345
2023-07-15 10:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table587
2023-07-15 10:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table587) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1441
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-15 10:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table346
2023-07-15 10:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table588
2023-07-15 10:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table588) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1200
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1442
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-15 10:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table347
2023-07-15 10:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table589
2023-07-15 10:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table589) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table348
2023-07-15 10:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-15 10:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table349
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-15 10:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-15 10:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1209
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1201
2023-07-15 10:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1443
2023-07-15 10:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1202
2023-07-15 10:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1444
2023-07-15 10:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1203
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1445
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-15 10:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1204
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1446
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-15 10:53:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1205
2023-07-15 10:53:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1447
2023-07-15 10:53:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-15 10:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1206
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1448
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-15 10:53:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table590
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table590) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1207
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1449
2023-07-15 10:53:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-15 10:53:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table591
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table591) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1208
2023-07-15 10:53:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-15 10:53:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table570
2023-07-15 10:53:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table570) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table571
2023-07-15 10:53:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table571) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-15 10:53:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table330
2023-07-15 10:53:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table572
2023-07-15 10:53:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table572) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-15 10:53:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table331
2023-07-15 10:53:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table573
2023-07-15 10:53:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table573) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-15 10:53:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table332
2023-07-15 10:53:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table574
2023-07-15 10:53:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table574) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-15 10:53:15,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table333
2023-07-15 10:53:15,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table575
2023-07-15 10:53:15,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table575) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table334
2023-07-15 10:53:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table576
2023-07-15 10:53:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table576) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1430
2023-07-15 10:53:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table335
2023-07-15 10:53:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table577
2023-07-15 10:53:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table577) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1431
2023-07-15 10:53:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table336
2023-07-15 10:53:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table578
2023-07-15 10:53:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table578) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table337
2023-07-15 10:53:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table579
2023-07-15 10:53:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table579) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table338
2023-07-15 10:53:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table339
2023-07-15 10:53:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1432
2023-07-15 10:53:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1433
2023-07-15 10:53:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1434
2023-07-15 10:53:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1435
2023-07-15 10:53:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-15 10:53:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1436
2023-07-15 10:53:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-15 10:53:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1437
2023-07-15 10:53:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-15 10:53:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1438
2023-07-15 10:53:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-15 10:53:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table580
2023-07-15 10:53:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table580) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1439
2023-07-15 10:53:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table284
2023-07-15 10:53:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table285
2023-07-15 10:53:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table286
2023-07-15 10:53:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table287
2023-07-15 10:53:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table288
2023-07-15 10:53:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table289
2023-07-15 10:53:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table290
2023-07-15 10:53:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table291
2023-07-15 10:53:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table292
2023-07-15 10:53:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table293
2023-07-15 10:53:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table294
2023-07-15 10:53:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table273
2023-07-15 10:53:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table274
2023-07-15 10:53:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table275
2023-07-15 10:53:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table276
2023-07-15 10:53:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table277
2023-07-15 10:53:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table278
2023-07-15 10:53:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table279
2023-07-15 10:53:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table280
2023-07-15 10:53:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table281
2023-07-15 10:53:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table282
2023-07-15 10:53:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table283
2023-07-15 10:53:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table295
2023-07-15 10:53:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table296
2023-07-15 10:53:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table297
2023-07-15 10:53:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table298
2023-07-15 10:53:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table299
2023-07-15 10:53:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table920
2023-07-15 10:53:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table920) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table921
2023-07-15 10:53:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table921) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table922
2023-07-15 10:53:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table922) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table923
2023-07-15 10:53:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table923) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table924
2023-07-15 10:53:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table924) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table925
2023-07-15 10:53:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table925) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table926
2023-07-15 10:53:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table926) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table927
2023-07-15 10:53:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table927) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table928
2023-07-15 10:53:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table928) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table929
2023-07-15 10:53:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table929) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1094
2023-07-15 10:53:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1094) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1095
2023-07-15 10:53:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1095) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1096
2023-07-15 10:53:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1096) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1097
2023-07-15 10:53:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1097) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1098
2023-07-15 10:53:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1098) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1099
2023-07-15 10:53:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1099) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table910
2023-07-15 10:53:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table910) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table911
2023-07-15 10:53:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table911) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table912
2023-07-15 10:53:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table912) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1090
2023-07-15 10:53:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1090) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table913
2023-07-15 10:53:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table913) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1091
2023-07-15 10:53:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1091) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table914
2023-07-15 10:53:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table914) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1092
2023-07-15 10:53:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1092) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table915
2023-07-15 10:53:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table915) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1093
2023-07-15 10:53:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1093) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table916
2023-07-15 10:53:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table916) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table917
2023-07-15 10:53:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table917) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table918
2023-07-15 10:53:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table918) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table919
2023-07-15 10:53:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table919) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1083
2023-07-15 10:53:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1083) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1084
2023-07-15 10:53:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1084) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1085
2023-07-15 10:53:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1085) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1086
2023-07-15 10:53:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1086) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1087
2023-07-15 10:53:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1087) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1088
2023-07-15 10:53:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1088) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1089
2023-07-15 10:53:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1089) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table940
2023-07-15 10:53:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table940) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table941
2023-07-15 10:53:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table941) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table700
2023-07-15 10:53:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table700) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table942
2023-07-15 10:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table942) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table701
2023-07-15 10:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table701) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table943
2023-07-15 10:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table943) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table702
2023-07-15 10:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table702) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table944
2023-07-15 10:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table944) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table703
2023-07-15 10:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table703) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table945
2023-07-15 10:53:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table945) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table704
2023-07-15 10:53:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table704) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table946
2023-07-15 10:53:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table946) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1080
2023-07-15 10:53:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1080) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table705
2023-07-15 10:53:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table705) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table947
2023-07-15 10:53:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table947) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1081
2023-07-15 10:53:15,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1081) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table706
2023-07-15 10:53:15,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table706) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table948
2023-07-15 10:53:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table948) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1082
2023-07-15 10:53:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1082) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table707
2023-07-15 10:53:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table707) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table949
2023-07-15 10:53:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table949) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table708
2023-07-15 10:53:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table708) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table709
2023-07-15 10:53:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table709) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1072
2023-07-15 10:53:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1072) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1073
2023-07-15 10:53:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1073) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1074
2023-07-15 10:53:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1074) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1075
2023-07-15 10:53:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1075) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1076
2023-07-15 10:53:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1076) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1077
2023-07-15 10:53:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1077) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1078
2023-07-15 10:53:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1078) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1079
2023-07-15 10:53:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1079) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table930
2023-07-15 10:53:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table930) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table931
2023-07-15 10:53:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table931) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table932
2023-07-15 10:53:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table932) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table933
2023-07-15 10:53:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table933) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table934
2023-07-15 10:53:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table934) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table935
2023-07-15 10:53:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table935) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table936
2023-07-15 10:53:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table936) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1070
2023-07-15 10:53:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1070) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table937
2023-07-15 10:53:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table937) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1071
2023-07-15 10:53:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1071) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table938
2023-07-15 10:53:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table938) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table939
2023-07-15 10:53:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table939) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table900
2023-07-15 10:53:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table900) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table901
2023-07-15 10:53:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table901) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table902
2023-07-15 10:53:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table902) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table903
2023-07-15 10:53:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table903) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table904
2023-07-15 10:53:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table904) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table905
2023-07-15 10:53:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table905) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table906
2023-07-15 10:53:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table906) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table907
2023-07-15 10:53:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table907) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table908
2023-07-15 10:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table908) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table909
2023-07-15 10:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203119932=2, srv247183822=4, srv1645525809=0, srv692876044=5, srv1879582457=1, srv2115011725=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table909) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1380
2023-07-15 10:53:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1381
2023-07-15 10:53:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table880
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table880) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1140
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1382
2023-07-15 10:53:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table881
2023-07-15 10:53:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table881) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1141
2023-07-15 10:53:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1383
2023-07-15 10:53:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table640
2023-07-15 10:53:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table640) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table882
2023-07-15 10:53:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table882) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1142
2023-07-15 10:53:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1384
2023-07-15 10:53:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table641
2023-07-15 10:53:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table641) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table883
2023-07-15 10:53:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table883) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1143
2023-07-15 10:53:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1385
2023-07-15 10:53:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table400
2023-07-15 10:53:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table642
2023-07-15 10:53:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table642) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table884
2023-07-15 10:53:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table884) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1144
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1386
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table401
2023-07-15 10:53:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table643
2023-07-15 10:53:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table643) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table885
2023-07-15 10:53:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table885) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1145
2023-07-15 10:53:15,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1387
2023-07-15 10:53:15,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table402
2023-07-15 10:53:15,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table644
2023-07-15 10:53:15,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table644) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table886
2023-07-15 10:53:15,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table886) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table403
2023-07-15 10:53:15,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table645
2023-07-15 10:53:15,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table645) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table887
2023-07-15 10:53:15,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table887) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table404
2023-07-15 10:53:15,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table646
2023-07-15 10:53:15,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table646) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table888
2023-07-15 10:53:15,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table888) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table405
2023-07-15 10:53:15,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table647
2023-07-15 10:53:15,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table647) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table889
2023-07-15 10:53:15,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table889) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table406
2023-07-15 10:53:15,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table648
2023-07-15 10:53:15,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table648) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table407
2023-07-15 10:53:15,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table649
2023-07-15 10:53:15,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table649) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table408
2023-07-15 10:53:15,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table409
2023-07-15 10:53:15,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1146
2023-07-15 10:53:15,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1388
2023-07-15 10:53:15,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1147
2023-07-15 10:53:15,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1389
2023-07-15 10:53:15,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1148
2023-07-15 10:53:15,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1149
2023-07-15 10:53:15,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1370
2023-07-15 10:53:15,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1371
2023-07-15 10:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table870
2023-07-15 10:53:15,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table870) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1130
2023-07-15 10:53:15,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1372
2023-07-15 10:53:15,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table871
2023-07-15 10:53:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table871) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1131
2023-07-15 10:53:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1373
2023-07-15 10:53:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table630
2023-07-15 10:53:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table630) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table872
2023-07-15 10:53:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table872) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1132
2023-07-15 10:53:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1374
2023-07-15 10:53:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table631
2023-07-15 10:53:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table631) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table873
2023-07-15 10:53:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table873) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1133
2023-07-15 10:53:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1375
2023-07-15 10:53:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table632
2023-07-15 10:53:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table632) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table874
2023-07-15 10:53:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table874) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1134
2023-07-15 10:53:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1376
2023-07-15 10:53:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table633
2023-07-15 10:53:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table633) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table875
2023-07-15 10:53:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table875) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table634
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table634) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table876
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table876) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table635
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table635) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table877
2023-07-15 10:53:15,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table877) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table636
2023-07-15 10:53:15,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table636) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table878
2023-07-15 10:53:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table878) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table637
2023-07-15 10:53:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table637) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table879
2023-07-15 10:53:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table879) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table638
2023-07-15 10:53:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table638) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table639
2023-07-15 10:53:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table639) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1135
2023-07-15 10:53:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1377
2023-07-15 10:53:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1136
2023-07-15 10:53:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1378
2023-07-15 10:53:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1137
2023-07-15 10:53:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1379
2023-07-15 10:53:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1138
2023-07-15 10:53:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1139
2023-07-15 10:53:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table660
2023-07-15 10:53:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table660) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1360
2023-07-15 10:53:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table661
2023-07-15 10:53:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table661) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1361
2023-07-15 10:53:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table420
2023-07-15 10:53:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table662
2023-07-15 10:53:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table662) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1120
2023-07-15 10:53:15,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1362
2023-07-15 10:53:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table421
2023-07-15 10:53:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table663
2023-07-15 10:53:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table663) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1121
2023-07-15 10:53:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1363
2023-07-15 10:53:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table422
2023-07-15 10:53:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table664
2023-07-15 10:53:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table664) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1122
2023-07-15 10:53:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1364
2023-07-15 10:53:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table423
2023-07-15 10:53:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table665
2023-07-15 10:53:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table665) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1123
2023-07-15 10:53:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1365
2023-07-15 10:53:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table424
2023-07-15 10:53:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table666
2023-07-15 10:53:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table666) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table425
2023-07-15 10:53:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table667
2023-07-15 10:53:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table667) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table426
2023-07-15 10:53:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table668
2023-07-15 10:53:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table668) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table427
2023-07-15 10:53:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table669
2023-07-15 10:53:15,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table669) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table428
2023-07-15 10:53:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table429
2023-07-15 10:53:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1124
2023-07-15 10:53:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1366
2023-07-15 10:53:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1125
2023-07-15 10:53:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1367
2023-07-15 10:53:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1126
2023-07-15 10:53:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1368
2023-07-15 10:53:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1127
2023-07-15 10:53:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1369
2023-07-15 10:53:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1128
2023-07-15 10:53:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1129
2023-07-15 10:53:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table890
2023-07-15 10:53:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table890) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table891
2023-07-15 10:53:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table891) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table650
2023-07-15 10:53:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table650) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table892
2023-07-15 10:53:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table892) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1350
2023-07-15 10:53:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table651
2023-07-15 10:53:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table651) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table893
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table893) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1351
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table410
2023-07-15 10:53:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table652
2023-07-15 10:53:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table652) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table894
2023-07-15 10:53:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table894) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1110
2023-07-15 10:53:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1352
2023-07-15 10:53:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table411
2023-07-15 10:53:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table653
2023-07-15 10:53:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table653) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table895
2023-07-15 10:53:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table895) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1111
2023-07-15 10:53:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1353
2023-07-15 10:53:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table412
2023-07-15 10:53:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table654
2023-07-15 10:53:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table654) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table896
2023-07-15 10:53:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table896) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1112
2023-07-15 10:53:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1354
2023-07-15 10:53:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table413
2023-07-15 10:53:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table655
2023-07-15 10:53:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table655) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table897
2023-07-15 10:53:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table897) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table414
2023-07-15 10:53:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table656
2023-07-15 10:53:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table656) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table898
2023-07-15 10:53:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table898) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table415
2023-07-15 10:53:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table657
2023-07-15 10:53:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table657) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table899
2023-07-15 10:53:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table899) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table416
2023-07-15 10:53:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table658
2023-07-15 10:53:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table658) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table417
2023-07-15 10:53:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table659
2023-07-15 10:53:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table659) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table418
2023-07-15 10:53:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table419
2023-07-15 10:53:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1113
2023-07-15 10:53:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1355
2023-07-15 10:53:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1114
2023-07-15 10:53:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1356
2023-07-15 10:53:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1115
2023-07-15 10:53:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1357
2023-07-15 10:53:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1116
2023-07-15 10:53:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1358
2023-07-15 10:53:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1117
2023-07-15 10:53:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1359
2023-07-15 10:53:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1118
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1119
2023-07-15 10:53:15,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1182
2023-07-15 10:53:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1183
2023-07-15 10:53:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1184
2023-07-15 10:53:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1185
2023-07-15 10:53:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1186
2023-07-15 10:53:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1187
2023-07-15 10:53:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table840
2023-07-15 10:53:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table840) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1188
2023-07-15 10:53:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table841
2023-07-15 10:53:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table841) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1189
2023-07-15 10:53:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table600
2023-07-15 10:53:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table600) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table842
2023-07-15 10:53:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table842) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table601
2023-07-15 10:53:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table601) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table843
2023-07-15 10:53:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table843) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table602
2023-07-15 10:53:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table602) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table844
2023-07-15 10:53:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table844) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table603
2023-07-15 10:53:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table603) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table845
2023-07-15 10:53:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table845) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table604
2023-07-15 10:53:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table604) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table846
2023-07-15 10:53:15,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table846) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table605
2023-07-15 10:53:15,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table605) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table847
2023-07-15 10:53:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table847) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table606
2023-07-15 10:53:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table606) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table848
2023-07-15 10:53:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table848) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1180
2023-07-15 10:53:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table607
2023-07-15 10:53:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table607) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table849
2023-07-15 10:53:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table849) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1181
2023-07-15 10:53:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table608
2023-07-15 10:53:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table608) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table609
2023-07-15 10:53:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table609) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1171
2023-07-15 10:53:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1172
2023-07-15 10:53:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1173
2023-07-15 10:53:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1174
2023-07-15 10:53:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1175
2023-07-15 10:53:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1176
2023-07-15 10:53:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1177
2023-07-15 10:53:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table830
2023-07-15 10:53:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table830) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1178
2023-07-15 10:53:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table831
2023-07-15 10:53:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table831) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table832
2023-07-15 10:53:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table832) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table833
2023-07-15 10:53:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table833) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table834
2023-07-15 10:53:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table834) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table835
2023-07-15 10:53:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table835) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table836
2023-07-15 10:53:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table836) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table837
2023-07-15 10:53:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table837) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table838
2023-07-15 10:53:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table838) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1170
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table839
2023-07-15 10:53:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table839) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1179
2023-07-15 10:53:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1160
2023-07-15 10:53:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1161
2023-07-15 10:53:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1162
2023-07-15 10:53:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1163
2023-07-15 10:53:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table860
2023-07-15 10:53:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table860) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1164
2023-07-15 10:53:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table861
2023-07-15 10:53:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table861) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1165
2023-07-15 10:53:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table620
2023-07-15 10:53:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table620) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table862
2023-07-15 10:53:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table862) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1166
2023-07-15 10:53:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table621
2023-07-15 10:53:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table621) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table863
2023-07-15 10:53:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table863) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1167
2023-07-15 10:53:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table622
2023-07-15 10:53:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table622) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table864
2023-07-15 10:53:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table864) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table623
2023-07-15 10:53:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table623) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table865
2023-07-15 10:53:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table865) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table624
2023-07-15 10:53:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table624) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table866
2023-07-15 10:53:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table866) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table625
2023-07-15 10:53:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table625) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table867
2023-07-15 10:53:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table867) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table626
2023-07-15 10:53:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table626) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table868
2023-07-15 10:53:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table868) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table627
2023-07-15 10:53:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table627) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table869
2023-07-15 10:53:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table869) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table628
2023-07-15 10:53:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table628) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table629
2023-07-15 10:53:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table629) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1168
2023-07-15 10:53:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1169
2023-07-15 10:53:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1391
2023-07-15 10:53:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1150
2023-07-15 10:53:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1392
2023-07-15 10:53:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1151
2023-07-15 10:53:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1393
2023-07-15 10:53:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1152
2023-07-15 10:53:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1394
2023-07-15 10:53:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1153
2023-07-15 10:53:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1395
2023-07-15 10:53:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table850
2023-07-15 10:53:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table850) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1154
2023-07-15 10:53:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1396
2023-07-15 10:53:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table851
2023-07-15 10:53:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table851) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1155
2023-07-15 10:53:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1397
2023-07-15 10:53:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table610
2023-07-15 10:53:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table610) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table852
2023-07-15 10:53:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table852) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1156
2023-07-15 10:53:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1398
2023-07-15 10:53:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table611
2023-07-15 10:53:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table611) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table853
2023-07-15 10:53:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table853) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table612
2023-07-15 10:53:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table612) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table854
2023-07-15 10:53:15,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table854) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table613
2023-07-15 10:53:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table613) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table855
2023-07-15 10:53:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table855) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table614
2023-07-15 10:53:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table614) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table856
2023-07-15 10:53:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table856) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table615
2023-07-15 10:53:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table615) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table857
2023-07-15 10:53:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table857) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table616
2023-07-15 10:53:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table616) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table858
2023-07-15 10:53:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table858) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table617
2023-07-15 10:53:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table617) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table859
2023-07-15 10:53:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table859) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table618
2023-07-15 10:53:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table618) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1390
2023-07-15 10:53:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table619
2023-07-15 10:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table619) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1157
2023-07-15 10:53:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1399
2023-07-15 10:53:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1158
2023-07-15 10:53:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1159
2023-07-15 10:53:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table240
2023-07-15 10:53:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table482
2023-07-15 10:53:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table241
2023-07-15 10:53:15,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table483
2023-07-15 10:53:15,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table242
2023-07-15 10:53:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table484
2023-07-15 10:53:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table243
2023-07-15 10:53:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table485
2023-07-15 10:53:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table244
2023-07-15 10:53:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table486
2023-07-15 10:53:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table245
2023-07-15 10:53:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table487
2023-07-15 10:53:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table246
2023-07-15 10:53:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table488
2023-07-15 10:53:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table247
2023-07-15 10:53:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table489
2023-07-15 10:53:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table248
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table249
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1308
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1309
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1300
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1301
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1302
2023-07-15 10:53:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1303
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1304
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table490
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1305
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table491
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1306
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table250
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table492
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1307
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table471
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table230
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table472
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table231
2023-07-15 10:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table473
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table232
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table474
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table233
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table475
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table234
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table476
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table235
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table477
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table236
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table478
2023-07-15 10:53:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table237
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table479
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table238
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table239
2023-07-15 10:53:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table480
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table481
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table262
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table263
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table264
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table265
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table266
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table267
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table268
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table269
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table270
2023-07-15 10:53:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table271
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table272
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table251
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table493
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table252
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table494
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table253
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table495
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table254
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table496
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table255
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table497
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table256
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table498
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table257
2023-07-15 10:53:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table499
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table258
2023-07-15 10:53:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table259
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table260
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table261
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table680
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table680) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table681
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table681) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table440
2023-07-15 10:53:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table682
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table682) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table441
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table683
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table683) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table200
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table442
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table684
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table684) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1340
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table201
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table443
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table685
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table685) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1341
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table202
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table444
2023-07-15 10:53:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table686
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table686) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1100
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1342
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table203
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table445
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table687
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table687) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1101
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1343
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table204
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table446
2023-07-15 10:53:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table688
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table688) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table205
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table447
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table689
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table689) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table206
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table448
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table207
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table449
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table208
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table209
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1102
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1344
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1103
2023-07-15 10:53:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1345
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1104
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1346
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1105
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1347
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1106
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1348
2023-07-15 10:53:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1107
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1349
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1108
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table690
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table690) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1109
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table670
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table670) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table671
2023-07-15 10:53:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table671) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table430
2023-07-15 10:53:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table672
2023-07-15 10:53:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table672) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table431
2023-07-15 10:53:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table673
2023-07-15 10:53:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table673) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table432
2023-07-15 10:53:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table674
2023-07-15 10:53:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table674) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1330
2023-07-15 10:53:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table433
2023-07-15 10:53:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table675
2023-07-15 10:53:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table675) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1331
2023-07-15 10:53:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table434
2023-07-15 10:53:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table676
2023-07-15 10:53:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table676) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1332
2023-07-15 10:53:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table435
2023-07-15 10:53:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table677
2023-07-15 10:53:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table677) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table436
2023-07-15 10:53:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table678
2023-07-15 10:53:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table678) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table437
2023-07-15 10:53:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table679
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table679) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table438
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table439
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1333
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1334
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1335
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1336
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1337
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1338
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1339
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table460
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table461
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table220
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table462
2023-07-15 10:53:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table221
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table463
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table222
2023-07-15 10:53:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table464
2023-07-15 10:53:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table223
2023-07-15 10:53:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table465
2023-07-15 10:53:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table224
2023-07-15 10:53:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table466
2023-07-15 10:53:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1320
2023-07-15 10:53:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table225
2023-07-15 10:53:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table467
2023-07-15 10:53:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1321
2023-07-15 10:53:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table226
2023-07-15 10:53:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table468
2023-07-15 10:53:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table227
2023-07-15 10:53:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table469
2023-07-15 10:53:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table228
2023-07-15 10:53:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table229
2023-07-15 10:53:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1322
2023-07-15 10:53:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1323
2023-07-15 10:53:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1324
2023-07-15 10:53:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1325
2023-07-15 10:53:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1326
2023-07-15 10:53:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1327
2023-07-15 10:53:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1328
2023-07-15 10:53:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table470
2023-07-15 10:53:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1329
2023-07-15 10:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table691
2023-07-15 10:53:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table691) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table450
2023-07-15 10:53:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table692
2023-07-15 10:53:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table692) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table451
2023-07-15 10:53:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table693
2023-07-15 10:53:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table693) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table210
2023-07-15 10:53:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table452
2023-07-15 10:53:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table694
2023-07-15 10:53:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table694) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table211
2023-07-15 10:53:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table453
2023-07-15 10:53:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table695
2023-07-15 10:53:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table695) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table212
2023-07-15 10:53:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table454
2023-07-15 10:53:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table696
2023-07-15 10:53:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table696) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table213
2023-07-15 10:53:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table455
2023-07-15 10:53:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table697
2023-07-15 10:53:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table697) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table214
2023-07-15 10:53:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table456
2023-07-15 10:53:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table698
2023-07-15 10:53:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table698) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1310
2023-07-15 10:53:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table215
2023-07-15 10:53:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table457
2023-07-15 10:53:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table699
2023-07-15 10:53:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table699) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table216
2023-07-15 10:53:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table458
2023-07-15 10:53:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table217
2023-07-15 10:53:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table459
2023-07-15 10:53:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table218
2023-07-15 10:53:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table219
2023-07-15 10:53:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1319
2023-07-15 10:53:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1311
2023-07-15 10:53:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1312
2023-07-15 10:53:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1313
2023-07-15 10:53:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1314
2023-07-15 10:53:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1315
2023-07-15 10:53:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1316
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1317
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1318
2023-07-15 10:53:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table196
2023-07-15 10:53:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table197
2023-07-15 10:53:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table198
2023-07-15 10:53:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table199
2023-07-15 10:53:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table163
2023-07-15 10:53:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table164
2023-07-15 10:53:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table165
2023-07-15 10:53:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table166
2023-07-15 10:53:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table167
2023-07-15 10:53:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table168
2023-07-15 10:53:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table169
2023-07-15 10:53:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table170
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table171
2023-07-15 10:53:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table172
2023-07-15 10:53:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table173
2023-07-15 10:53:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-15 10:53:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table394
2023-07-15 10:53:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-15 10:53:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table395
2023-07-15 10:53:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-15 10:53:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table396
2023-07-15 10:53:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table155
2023-07-15 10:53:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table397
2023-07-15 10:53:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table156
2023-07-15 10:53:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table398
2023-07-15 10:53:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table157
2023-07-15 10:53:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table399
2023-07-15 10:53:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table158
2023-07-15 10:53:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table159
2023-07-15 10:53:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table160
2023-07-15 10:53:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table161
2023-07-15 10:53:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table162
2023-07-15 10:53:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table185
2023-07-15 10:53:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table186
2023-07-15 10:53:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table187
2023-07-15 10:53:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table188
2023-07-15 10:53:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table189
2023-07-15 10:53:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table190
2023-07-15 10:53:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table191
2023-07-15 10:53:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table192
2023-07-15 10:53:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table193
2023-07-15 10:53:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table194
2023-07-15 10:53:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table195
2023-07-15 10:53:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table174
2023-07-15 10:53:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table175
2023-07-15 10:53:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table176
2023-07-15 10:53:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table177
2023-07-15 10:53:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table178
2023-07-15 10:53:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table179
2023-07-15 10:53:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table180
2023-07-15 10:53:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table181
2023-07-15 10:53:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table182
2023-07-15 10:53:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table183
2023-07-15 10:53:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table184
2023-07-15 10:53:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table800
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table800) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table801
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table801) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table802
2023-07-15 10:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table802) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table803
2023-07-15 10:53:15,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table803) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table804
2023-07-15 10:53:15,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table804) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table805
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:15,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table805) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table806
2023-07-15 10:53:16,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table806) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table807
2023-07-15 10:53:16,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table807) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table808
2023-07-15 10:53:16,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table808) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table809
2023-07-15 10:53:16,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table809) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table820
2023-07-15 10:53:16,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table820) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table821
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table821) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table822
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table822) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table823
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table823) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table824
2023-07-15 10:53:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table824) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table825
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table825) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table826
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table826) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table827
2023-07-15 10:53:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table827) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table828
2023-07-15 10:53:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table828) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table829
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table829) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1193
2023-07-15 10:53:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1194
2023-07-15 10:53:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1195
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1196
2023-07-15 10:53:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1197
2023-07-15 10:53:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1198
2023-07-15 10:53:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1199
2023-07-15 10:53:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table810
2023-07-15 10:53:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table810) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table811
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table811) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table812
2023-07-15 10:53:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table812) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table813
2023-07-15 10:53:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table813) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table814
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table814) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1190
2023-07-15 10:53:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table815
2023-07-15 10:53:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table815) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1191
2023-07-15 10:53:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table816
2023-07-15 10:53:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table816) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1192
2023-07-15 10:53:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table817
2023-07-15 10:53:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table817) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table818
2023-07-15 10:53:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table818) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table819
2023-07-15 10:53:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table819) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1260
2023-07-15 10:53:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1261
2023-07-15 10:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table760
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table760) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1020
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1020) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1262
2023-07-15 10:53:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table761
2023-07-15 10:53:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table761) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1021
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1021) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1263
2023-07-15 10:53:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table520
2023-07-15 10:53:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table520) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table762
2023-07-15 10:53:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table762) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1022
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1022) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1264
2023-07-15 10:53:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table521
2023-07-15 10:53:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table521) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table763
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table763) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1023
2023-07-15 10:53:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1023) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1265
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table522
2023-07-15 10:53:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table522) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table764
2023-07-15 10:53:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table764) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1024
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1024) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1266
2023-07-15 10:53:16,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table523
2023-07-15 10:53:16,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table523) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table765
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table765) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table524
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table524) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table766
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table766) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table525
2023-07-15 10:53:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table525) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table767
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table767) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table526
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table526) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table768
2023-07-15 10:53:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table768) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table527
2023-07-15 10:53:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table527) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table769
2023-07-15 10:53:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table769) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table528
2023-07-15 10:53:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table528) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table529
2023-07-15 10:53:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table529) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-15 10:53:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-15 10:53:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-15 10:53:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1025
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1025) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1267
2023-07-15 10:53:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-15 10:53:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1026
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1026) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1268
2023-07-15 10:53:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-15 10:53:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1027
2023-07-15 10:53:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1027) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1269
2023-07-15 10:53:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-15 10:53:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1028
2023-07-15 10:53:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1028) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-15 10:53:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1029
2023-07-15 10:53:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1029) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-15 10:53:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-15 10:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1490
2023-07-15 10:53:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1491
2023-07-15 10:53:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table990
2023-07-15 10:53:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table990) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1250
2023-07-15 10:53:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1492
2023-07-15 10:53:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table991
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table991) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1251
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1493
2023-07-15 10:53:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table750
2023-07-15 10:53:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table750) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table992
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table992) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1010
2023-07-15 10:53:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1010) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1252
2023-07-15 10:53:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1494
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table751
2023-07-15 10:53:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table751) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table993
2023-07-15 10:53:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table993) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1011
2023-07-15 10:53:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1011) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1253
2023-07-15 10:53:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1495
2023-07-15 10:53:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table510
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table510) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table752
2023-07-15 10:53:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table752) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table994
2023-07-15 10:53:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table994) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1012
2023-07-15 10:53:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1012) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1254
2023-07-15 10:53:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1496
2023-07-15 10:53:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table511
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table511) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table753
2023-07-15 10:53:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table753) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table995
2023-07-15 10:53:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table995) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1013
2023-07-15 10:53:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1013) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1255
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1497
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table512
2023-07-15 10:53:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table512) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table754
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table754) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table996
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table996) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table513
2023-07-15 10:53:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table513) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table755
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table755) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table997
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table997) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table514
2023-07-15 10:53:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table514) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table756
2023-07-15 10:53:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table756) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table998
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table998) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table515
2023-07-15 10:53:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table515) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table757
2023-07-15 10:53:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table757) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table999
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table999) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table516
2023-07-15 10:53:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table516) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table758
2023-07-15 10:53:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table758) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table517
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table517) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table759
2023-07-15 10:53:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table759) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table518
2023-07-15 10:53:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table518) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table519
2023-07-15 10:53:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table519) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-15 10:53:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-15 10:53:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-15 10:53:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1014
2023-07-15 10:53:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1014) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1256
2023-07-15 10:53:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1498
2023-07-15 10:53:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-15 10:53:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1015
2023-07-15 10:53:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1015) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1257
2023-07-15 10:53:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1499
2023-07-15 10:53:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-15 10:53:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1016
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1016) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1258
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-15 10:53:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1017
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1017) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1259
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-15 10:53:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1018
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1018) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1019
2023-07-15 10:53:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1019) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-15 10:53:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-15 10:53:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-15 10:53:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table780
2023-07-15 10:53:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table780) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1480
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table781
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table781) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1481
2023-07-15 10:53:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table540
2023-07-15 10:53:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table540) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table782
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table782) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1240
2023-07-15 10:53:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1482
2023-07-15 10:53:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table541
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table541) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table783
2023-07-15 10:53:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table783) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1241
2023-07-15 10:53:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1483
2023-07-15 10:53:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table300
2023-07-15 10:53:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table542
2023-07-15 10:53:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table542) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table784
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table784) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1000
2023-07-15 10:53:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1000) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1242
2023-07-15 10:53:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1484
2023-07-15 10:53:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table301
2023-07-15 10:53:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table543
2023-07-15 10:53:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table543) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table785
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table785) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1001
2023-07-15 10:53:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1001) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1243
2023-07-15 10:53:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1485
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table302
2023-07-15 10:53:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table544
2023-07-15 10:53:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table544) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table786
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table786) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1002
2023-07-15 10:53:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1002) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1244
2023-07-15 10:53:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1486
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table303
2023-07-15 10:53:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table545
2023-07-15 10:53:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table545) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table787
2023-07-15 10:53:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table787) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table304
2023-07-15 10:53:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table546
2023-07-15 10:53:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table546) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table788
2023-07-15 10:53:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table788) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table305
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table547
2023-07-15 10:53:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table547) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table789
2023-07-15 10:53:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table789) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table306
2023-07-15 10:53:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table548
2023-07-15 10:53:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table548) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table307
2023-07-15 10:53:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table549
2023-07-15 10:53:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table549) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table308
2023-07-15 10:53:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table309
2023-07-15 10:53:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-15 10:53:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-15 10:53:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1003
2023-07-15 10:53:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1003) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1245
2023-07-15 10:53:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1487
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-15 10:53:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1004
2023-07-15 10:53:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1004) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1246
2023-07-15 10:53:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1488
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1005
2023-07-15 10:53:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1005) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1247
2023-07-15 10:53:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1489
2023-07-15 10:53:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-15 10:53:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1006
2023-07-15 10:53:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1006) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1248
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-15 10:53:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1007
2023-07-15 10:53:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1007) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1249
2023-07-15 10:53:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-15 10:53:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1008
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1008) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1009
2023-07-15 10:53:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1009) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-15 10:53:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-15 10:53:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-15 10:53:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table770
2023-07-15 10:53:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table770) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1470
2023-07-15 10:53:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table771
2023-07-15 10:53:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table771) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1471
2023-07-15 10:53:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table530
2023-07-15 10:53:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table530) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table772
2023-07-15 10:53:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table772) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1230
2023-07-15 10:53:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1472
2023-07-15 10:53:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table531
2023-07-15 10:53:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table531) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table773
2023-07-15 10:53:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table773) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1231
2023-07-15 10:53:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1473
2023-07-15 10:53:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table532
2023-07-15 10:53:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table532) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table774
2023-07-15 10:53:16,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table774) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1232
2023-07-15 10:53:16,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1474
2023-07-15 10:53:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table533
2023-07-15 10:53:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table533) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table775
2023-07-15 10:53:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table775) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1233
2023-07-15 10:53:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1475
2023-07-15 10:53:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table534
2023-07-15 10:53:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table534) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table776
2023-07-15 10:53:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table776) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table535
2023-07-15 10:53:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table535) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table777
2023-07-15 10:53:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table777) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table536
2023-07-15 10:53:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table536) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table778
2023-07-15 10:53:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table778) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table537
2023-07-15 10:53:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table537) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table779
2023-07-15 10:53:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table779) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table538
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table538) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table539
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table539) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-15 10:53:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1234
2023-07-15 10:53:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1476
2023-07-15 10:53:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-15 10:53:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1235
2023-07-15 10:53:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1477
2023-07-15 10:53:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-15 10:53:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1236
2023-07-15 10:53:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1478
2023-07-15 10:53:16,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-15 10:53:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1237
2023-07-15 10:53:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1479
2023-07-15 10:53:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-15 10:53:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1238
2023-07-15 10:53:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-15 10:53:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1239
2023-07-15 10:53:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-15 10:53:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-15 10:53:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1061
2023-07-15 10:53:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1061) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1062
2023-07-15 10:53:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1062) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1063
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1063) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1064
2023-07-15 10:53:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1064) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1065
2023-07-15 10:53:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1065) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table960
2023-07-15 10:53:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table960) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1066
2023-07-15 10:53:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1066) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table961
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table961) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1067
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1067) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table720
2023-07-15 10:53:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table720) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table962
2023-07-15 10:53:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table962) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1068
2023-07-15 10:53:16,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1068) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table721
2023-07-15 10:53:16,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table721) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table963
2023-07-15 10:53:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table963) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table722
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table722) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table964
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table964) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table723
2023-07-15 10:53:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table723) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table965
2023-07-15 10:53:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table965) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table724
2023-07-15 10:53:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table724) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table966
2023-07-15 10:53:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table966) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table725
2023-07-15 10:53:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table725) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table967
2023-07-15 10:53:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table967) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table726
2023-07-15 10:53:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table726) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table968
2023-07-15 10:53:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table968) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table727
2023-07-15 10:53:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table727) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table969
2023-07-15 10:53:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table969) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table728
2023-07-15 10:53:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table728) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1060
2023-07-15 10:53:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1060) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table729
2023-07-15 10:53:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table729) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1069
2023-07-15 10:53:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1069) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1050
2023-07-15 10:53:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1050) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1292
2023-07-15 10:53:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1051
2023-07-15 10:53:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1051) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1293
2023-07-15 10:53:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1052
2023-07-15 10:53:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1052) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1294
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1053
2023-07-15 10:53:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1053) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1295
2023-07-15 10:53:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1054
2023-07-15 10:53:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1054) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1296
2023-07-15 10:53:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1055
2023-07-15 10:53:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1055) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1297
2023-07-15 10:53:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table950
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table950) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1056
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1056) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1298
2023-07-15 10:53:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table951
2023-07-15 10:53:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table951) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1057
2023-07-15 10:53:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1057) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1299
2023-07-15 10:53:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table710
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table710) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table952
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table952) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table711
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table711) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table953
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table953) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table712
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table712) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table954
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table954) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table713
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table713) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table955
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table955) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table714
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table714) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table956
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table956) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table715
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table715) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table957
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table957) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table716
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table716) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table958
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table958) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1290
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table717
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table717) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table959
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table959) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1291
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table718
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table718) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table719
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table719) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1058
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1058) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1059
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1059) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1281
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1040
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1040) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1282
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1041
2023-07-15 10:53:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1041) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1283
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table980
2023-07-15 10:53:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table980) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1042
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1042) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1284
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table981
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table981) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1043
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1043) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1285
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table740
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table740) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table982
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table982) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1044
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1044) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1286
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table741
2023-07-15 10:53:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table741) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table983
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table983) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1045
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1045) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1287
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table500
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table500) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table742
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table742) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table984
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table984) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1046
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1046) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1288
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table501
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table501) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table743
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table743) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table985
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table985) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table502
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table502) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table744
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table744) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table986
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table986) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table503
2023-07-15 10:53:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table503) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table745
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table745) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table987
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table987) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table504
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table504) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table746
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table746) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table988
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table988) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table505
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table505) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table747
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table747) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table989
2023-07-15 10:53:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table989) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table506
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table506) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table748
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table748) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table507
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table507) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table749
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table749) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table508
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table508) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1280
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table509
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table509) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1047
2023-07-15 10:53:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1047) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1289
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1048
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1048) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1049
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1049) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1270
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1271
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1030
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1030) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1272
2023-07-15 10:53:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1031
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1031) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1273
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table970
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table970) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1032
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1032) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1274
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table971
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table971) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1033
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1033) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1275
2023-07-15 10:53:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table730
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table730) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table972
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table972) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1034
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1034) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1276
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table731
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table731) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table973
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table973) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1035
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1035) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1277
2023-07-15 10:53:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table732
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table732) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table974
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table974) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table733
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table733) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table975
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table975) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table734
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table734) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table976
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table976) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table735
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table735) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table977
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table977) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table736
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table736) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table978
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table978) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table737
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table737) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table979
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table979) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table738
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table738) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table739
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table739) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1036
2023-07-15 10:53:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1036) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1278
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1037
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1037) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1279
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1038
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1038) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1039
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1039) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table361
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table362
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table363
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table364
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table365
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table366
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table367
2023-07-15 10:53:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table368
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1420
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table369
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1429
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1421
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1422
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1423
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1424
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1425
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1426
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table370
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1427
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table371
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1428
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table350
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table592
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table592) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table351
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table593
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table593) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table352
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table594
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table594) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table353
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table595
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table595) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table354
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table596
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table596) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table355
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table597
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table597) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table356
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table598
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table598) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table357
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table599
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table599) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table358
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table359
2023-07-15 10:53:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1418
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1419
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1410
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1411
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1412
2023-07-15 10:53:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1413
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1414
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1415
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1416
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table360
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1417
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table383
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table384
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table385
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table386
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table387
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table388
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table389
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1407
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1408
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1409
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1400
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1401
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1402
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table390
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1403
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table391
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1404
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table392
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1405
2023-07-15 10:53:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table393
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1406
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table372
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table373
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table374
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table375
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-15 10:53:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table376
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table377
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table378
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table379
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table380
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table381
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table382
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table560
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table560) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table561
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table561) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table320
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table562
2023-07-15 10:53:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table562) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1460
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table321
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table563
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table563) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1461
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table322
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table564
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table564) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1220
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1462
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table323
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table565
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table565) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1221
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1463
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table324
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table566
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table566) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1222
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1464
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table325
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table567
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table567) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table326
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table568
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table568) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table327
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table569
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table569) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table328
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table329
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1223
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1465
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1224
2023-07-15 10:53:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1466
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1225
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1467
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1226
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1468
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1227
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1469
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1228
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1229
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table790
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table790) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table791
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table791) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table550
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table550) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table792
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table792) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table551
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table551) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table793
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table793) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table310
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table552
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table552) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table794
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table794) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1450
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table311
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table553
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table553) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table795
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table795) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1451
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table312
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table554
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table554) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table796
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table796) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1210
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1452
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table313
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table555
2023-07-15 10:53:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table555) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table797
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table797) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1211
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1453
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table314
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table556
2023-07-15 10:53:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table556) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table798
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table798) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table315
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table557
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table557) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table799
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table799) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table316
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table558
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table558) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table317
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table559
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table559) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table318
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table319
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1212
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1454
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1213
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1455
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-15 10:53:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1214
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1456
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1215
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1457
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1216
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1458
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1217
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1459
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-15 10:53:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1218
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1219
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table581
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table581) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table340
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table582
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table582) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table341
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table583
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table583) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table342
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table584
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table584) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table343
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table585
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table585) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table344
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table586
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table586) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1440
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table345
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table587
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table587) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1441
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table346
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table588
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table588) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1200
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1442
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table347
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table589
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table589) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table348
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table349
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1209
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1201
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1443
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1202
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1444
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1203
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1445
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1204
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1446
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1205
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1447
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1206
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1448
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table590
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table590) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1207
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1449
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table591
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table591) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1208
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table570
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table570) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table571
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table571) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table330
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table572
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table572) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table331
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table573
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table573) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table332
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table574
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table574) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table333
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table575
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table575) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table334
2023-07-15 10:53:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table576
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table576) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1430
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table335
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table577
2023-07-15 10:53:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table577) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1431
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table336
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table578
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table578) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table337
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table579
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table579) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table338
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table339
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1432
2023-07-15 10:53:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1433
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1434
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1435
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1436
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1437
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1438
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table580
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table580) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1439
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table284
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table285
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table286
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table287
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table288
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table289
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table290
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table291
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table292
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table293
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table294
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table273
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table274
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table275
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table276
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table277
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table278
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table279
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table280
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table281
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table282
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table283
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table295
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table296
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table297
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table298
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table299
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table920
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table920) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table921
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table921) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table922
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table922) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table923
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table923) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table924
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table924) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table925
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table925) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table926
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table926) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table927
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table927) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table928
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table928) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table929
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table929) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1094
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1094) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1095
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1095) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1096
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1096) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1097
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1097) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1098
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1098) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1099
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1099) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table910
2023-07-15 10:53:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table910) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table911
2023-07-15 10:53:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table911) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table912
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table912) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1090
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1090) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table913
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table913) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1091
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1091) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table914
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table914) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1092
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1092) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table915
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table915) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1093
2023-07-15 10:53:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1093) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table916
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table916) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table917
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table917) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table918
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table918) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table919
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table919) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1083
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1083) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1084
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1084) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1085
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1085) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1086
2023-07-15 10:53:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1086) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1087
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1087) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1088
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1088) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1089
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1089) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table940
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table940) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table941
2023-07-15 10:53:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table941) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table700
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table700) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table942
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table942) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table701
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table701) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table943
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table943) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table702
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table702) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table944
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table944) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table703
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table703) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table945
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table945) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table704
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table704) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table946
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table946) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1080
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1080) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table705
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table705) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table947
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table947) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1081
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1081) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table706
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table706) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table948
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table948) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1082
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1082) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table707
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table707) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table949
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table949) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table708
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table708) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table709
2023-07-15 10:53:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table709) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1072
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1072) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1073
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1073) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1074
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1074) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1075
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1075) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1076
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1076) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1077
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1077) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1078
2023-07-15 10:53:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1078) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1079
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1079) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table930
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table930) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table931
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table931) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table932
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table932) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table933
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table933) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table934
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table934) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table935
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table935) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table936
2023-07-15 10:53:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table936) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1070
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1070) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table937
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table937) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1071
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1071) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table938
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table938) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table939
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table939) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table900
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table900) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table901
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table901) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table902
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table902) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table903
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table903) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table904
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table904) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table905
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table905) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table906
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table906) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table907
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table907) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table908
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table908) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table909
2023-07-15 10:53:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635427640=3, srv1343858982=1, srv954552996=5, srv1253550411=0, srv257756643=2, srv697777833=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table909) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1325543821=1, srv902258943=13, srv1407941240=2, srv1569064819=5, srv405653280=10, srv2050971300=8, srv238627465=9, srv544045923=12, srv1075838682=0, srv144478620=3, srv2000356592=7, srv506478993=11, srv1631540969=6, srv152551330=4, srv927744136=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1325543821=1, srv902258943=13, srv1407941240=2, srv1569064819=5, srv405653280=10, srv2050971300=8, srv238627465=9, srv544045923=12, srv1075838682=0, srv144478620=3, srv2000356592=7, srv506478993=11, srv1631540969=6, srv152551330=4, srv927744136=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1325543821=1, srv902258943=13, srv1407941240=2, srv1569064819=5, srv405653280=10, srv2050971300=8, srv238627465=9, srv544045923=12, srv1075838682=0, srv144478620=3, srv2000356592=7, srv506478993=11, srv1631540969=6, srv152551330=4, srv927744136=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1325543821=1, srv902258943=13, srv1407941240=2, srv1569064819=5, srv405653280=10, srv2050971300=8, srv238627465=9, srv544045923=12, srv1075838682=0, srv144478620=3, srv2000356592=7, srv506478993=11, srv1631540969=6, srv152551330=4, srv927744136=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1325543821=1, srv902258943=13, srv1407941240=2, srv1569064819=5, srv405653280=10, srv2050971300=8, srv238627465=9, srv544045923=12, srv1075838682=0, srv144478620=3, srv2000356592=7, srv506478993=11, srv1631540969=6, srv152551330=4, srv927744136=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1325543821=1, srv902258943=13, srv1407941240=2, srv1569064819=5, srv405653280=10, srv2050971300=8, srv238627465=9, srv544045923=12, srv1075838682=0, srv144478620=3, srv2000356592=7, srv506478993=11, srv1631540969=6, srv152551330=4, srv927744136=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1325543821=1, srv902258943=13, srv1407941240=2, srv1569064819=5, srv405653280=10, srv2050971300=8, srv238627465=9, srv544045923=12, srv1075838682=0, srv144478620=3, srv2000356592=7, srv506478993=11, srv1631540969=6, srv152551330=4, srv927744136=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1325543821=1, srv902258943=13, srv1407941240=2, srv1569064819=5, srv405653280=10, srv2050971300=8, srv238627465=9, srv544045923=12, srv1075838682=0, srv144478620=3, srv2000356592=7, srv506478993=11, srv1631540969=6, srv152551330=4, srv927744136=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1325543821=1, srv902258943=13, srv1407941240=2, srv1569064819=5, srv405653280=10, srv2050971300=8, srv238627465=9, srv544045923=12, srv1075838682=0, srv144478620=3, srv2000356592=7, srv506478993=11, srv1631540969=6, srv152551330=4, srv927744136=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1325543821=1, srv902258943=13, srv1407941240=2, srv1569064819=5, srv405653280=10, srv2050971300=8, srv238627465=9, srv544045923=12, srv1075838682=0, srv144478620=3, srv2000356592=7, srv506478993=11, srv1631540969=6, srv152551330=4, srv927744136=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1325543821=1, srv902258943=13, srv1407941240=2, srv1569064819=5, srv405653280=10, srv2050971300=8, srv238627465=9, srv544045923=12, srv1075838682=0, srv144478620=3, srv2000356592=7, srv506478993=11, srv1631540969=6, srv152551330=4, srv927744136=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1325543821=1, srv902258943=13, srv1407941240=2, srv1569064819=5, srv405653280=10, srv2050971300=8, srv238627465=9, srv544045923=12, srv1075838682=0, srv144478620=3, srv2000356592=7, srv506478993=11, srv1631540969=6, srv152551330=4, srv927744136=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1325543821=1, srv902258943=13, srv1407941240=2, srv1569064819=5, srv405653280=10, srv2050971300=8, srv238627465=9, srv544045923=12, srv1075838682=0, srv144478620=3, srv2000356592=7, srv506478993=11, srv1631540969=6, srv152551330=4, srv927744136=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1325543821=1, srv902258943=13, srv1407941240=2, srv1569064819=5, srv405653280=10, srv2050971300=8, srv238627465=9, srv544045923=12, srv1075838682=0, srv144478620=3, srv2000356592=7, srv506478993=11, srv1631540969=6, srv152551330=4, srv927744136=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1325543821=1, srv902258943=13, srv1407941240=2, srv1569064819=5, srv405653280=10, srv2050971300=8, srv238627465=9, srv544045923=12, srv1075838682=0, srv144478620=3, srv2000356592=7, srv506478993=11, srv1631540969=6, srv152551330=4, srv927744136=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1518232524=4, srv1350891640=2, srv357295088=7, srv1274403450=1, srv1507518082=3, srv1135734788=0, srv2116713405=5, srv421988768=8, srv354190360=6, srv514034590=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1518232524=4, srv1350891640=2, srv357295088=7, srv1274403450=1, srv1507518082=3, srv1135734788=0, srv2116713405=5, srv421988768=8, srv354190360=6, srv514034590=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1518232524=4, srv1350891640=2, srv357295088=7, srv1274403450=1, srv1507518082=3, srv1135734788=0, srv2116713405=5, srv421988768=8, srv354190360=6, srv514034590=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1518232524=4, srv1350891640=2, srv357295088=7, srv1274403450=1, srv1507518082=3, srv1135734788=0, srv2116713405=5, srv421988768=8, srv354190360=6, srv514034590=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1518232524=4, srv1350891640=2, srv357295088=7, srv1274403450=1, srv1507518082=3, srv1135734788=0, srv2116713405=5, srv421988768=8, srv354190360=6, srv514034590=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1518232524=4, srv1350891640=2, srv357295088=7, srv1274403450=1, srv1507518082=3, srv1135734788=0, srv2116713405=5, srv421988768=8, srv354190360=6, srv514034590=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1518232524=4, srv1350891640=2, srv357295088=7, srv1274403450=1, srv1507518082=3, srv1135734788=0, srv2116713405=5, srv421988768=8, srv354190360=6, srv514034590=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1518232524=4, srv1350891640=2, srv357295088=7, srv1274403450=1, srv1507518082=3, srv1135734788=0, srv2116713405=5, srv421988768=8, srv354190360=6, srv514034590=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1518232524=4, srv1350891640=2, srv357295088=7, srv1274403450=1, srv1507518082=3, srv1135734788=0, srv2116713405=5, srv421988768=8, srv354190360=6, srv514034590=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1518232524=4, srv1350891640=2, srv357295088=7, srv1274403450=1, srv1507518082=3, srv1135734788=0, srv2116713405=5, srv421988768=8, srv354190360=6, srv514034590=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136858392=2, srv156536318=4, srv1910227534=6, srv1020274324=0, srv183934728=5, srv1425933326=3, srv788443276=9, srv104855983=1, srv1945207422=7, srv333456937=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136858392=2, srv156536318=4, srv1910227534=6, srv1020274324=0, srv183934728=5, srv1425933326=3, srv788443276=9, srv104855983=1, srv1945207422=7, srv333456937=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136858392=2, srv156536318=4, srv1910227534=6, srv1020274324=0, srv183934728=5, srv1425933326=3, srv788443276=9, srv104855983=1, srv1945207422=7, srv333456937=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136858392=2, srv156536318=4, srv1910227534=6, srv1020274324=0, srv183934728=5, srv1425933326=3, srv788443276=9, srv104855983=1, srv1945207422=7, srv333456937=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136858392=2, srv156536318=4, srv1910227534=6, srv1020274324=0, srv183934728=5, srv1425933326=3, srv788443276=9, srv104855983=1, srv1945207422=7, srv333456937=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136858392=2, srv156536318=4, srv1910227534=6, srv1020274324=0, srv183934728=5, srv1425933326=3, srv788443276=9, srv104855983=1, srv1945207422=7, srv333456937=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-15 10:53:16,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-15 10:53:16,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-15 10:53:16,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-15 10:53:16,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-15 10:53:16,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-15 10:53:16,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-15 10:53:16,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-15 10:53:16,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-15 10:53:16,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-15 10:53:16,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-15 10:53:16,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1688877616=2, srv957184800=9, srv194238570=4, srv1276929134=1, srv2016294433=6, srv2001955084=5, srv38814510=8, srv1011278875=0, srv1841303244=3, srv269926708=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-15 10:53:16,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-15 10:53:16,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-15 10:53:16,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-15 10:53:16,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-15 10:53:16,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1314353164=1, srv1778672427=3, srv517866770=9, srv1270091621=0, srv2055468248=6, srv417899841=8, srv313584237=7, srv1882077994=4, srv1969309248=5, srv1580813572=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-15 10:53:16,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-15 10:53:16,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv712970986=7, srv843494668=8, srv1082224936=0, srv1760383558=4, srv137029762=1, srv949543167=9, srv1575214276=2, srv170180085=3, srv239920143=5, srv425902156=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-15 10:53:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2026939638=5, srv651969448=6, srv959572932=9, srv139358591=1, srv100314661=0, srv879838224=7, srv952968848=8, srv1598341047=3, srv1587080499=2, srv1750128668=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1432452809=3, srv8121720=9, srv1369758598=2, srv1162966744=0, srv1692814514=6, srv1481771772=4, srv1947512569=7, srv1240415747=1, srv1554570568=5, srv419442082=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1432452809=3, srv8121720=9, srv1369758598=2, srv1162966744=0, srv1692814514=6, srv1481771772=4, srv1947512569=7, srv1240415747=1, srv1554570568=5, srv419442082=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1432452809=3, srv8121720=9, srv1369758598=2, srv1162966744=0, srv1692814514=6, srv1481771772=4, srv1947512569=7, srv1240415747=1, srv1554570568=5, srv419442082=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1432452809=3, srv8121720=9, srv1369758598=2, srv1162966744=0, srv1692814514=6, srv1481771772=4, srv1947512569=7, srv1240415747=1, srv1554570568=5, srv419442082=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1432452809=3, srv8121720=9, srv1369758598=2, srv1162966744=0, srv1692814514=6, srv1481771772=4, srv1947512569=7, srv1240415747=1, srv1554570568=5, srv419442082=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1432452809=3, srv8121720=9, srv1369758598=2, srv1162966744=0, srv1692814514=6, srv1481771772=4, srv1947512569=7, srv1240415747=1, srv1554570568=5, srv419442082=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1432452809=3, srv8121720=9, srv1369758598=2, srv1162966744=0, srv1692814514=6, srv1481771772=4, srv1947512569=7, srv1240415747=1, srv1554570568=5, srv419442082=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1432452809=3, srv8121720=9, srv1369758598=2, srv1162966744=0, srv1692814514=6, srv1481771772=4, srv1947512569=7, srv1240415747=1, srv1554570568=5, srv419442082=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv382037128=4, srv464497030=6, srv773892389=7, srv395040709=5, srv1754428800=1, srv28199868=3, srv87505590=8, srv1456486102=0, srv967852110=9, srv1817457669=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv382037128=4, srv464497030=6, srv773892389=7, srv395040709=5, srv1754428800=1, srv28199868=3, srv87505590=8, srv1456486102=0, srv967852110=9, srv1817457669=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv382037128=4, srv464497030=6, srv773892389=7, srv395040709=5, srv1754428800=1, srv28199868=3, srv87505590=8, srv1456486102=0, srv967852110=9, srv1817457669=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv382037128=4, srv464497030=6, srv773892389=7, srv395040709=5, srv1754428800=1, srv28199868=3, srv87505590=8, srv1456486102=0, srv967852110=9, srv1817457669=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv382037128=4, srv464497030=6, srv773892389=7, srv395040709=5, srv1754428800=1, srv28199868=3, srv87505590=8, srv1456486102=0, srv967852110=9, srv1817457669=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv382037128=4, srv464497030=6, srv773892389=7, srv395040709=5, srv1754428800=1, srv28199868=3, srv87505590=8, srv1456486102=0, srv967852110=9, srv1817457669=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv382037128=4, srv464497030=6, srv773892389=7, srv395040709=5, srv1754428800=1, srv28199868=3, srv87505590=8, srv1456486102=0, srv967852110=9, srv1817457669=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv382037128=4, srv464497030=6, srv773892389=7, srv395040709=5, srv1754428800=1, srv28199868=3, srv87505590=8, srv1456486102=0, srv967852110=9, srv1817457669=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv382037128=4, srv464497030=6, srv773892389=7, srv395040709=5, srv1754428800=1, srv28199868=3, srv87505590=8, srv1456486102=0, srv967852110=9, srv1817457669=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv171764832=3, srv441615018=8, srv564952193=9, srv1538775250=2, srv1188591276=0, srv2020572505=5, srv2108790821=6, srv420864182=7, srv1206199929=1, srv1784369090=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv171764832=3, srv441615018=8, srv564952193=9, srv1538775250=2, srv1188591276=0, srv2020572505=5, srv2108790821=6, srv420864182=7, srv1206199929=1, srv1784369090=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv171764832=3, srv441615018=8, srv564952193=9, srv1538775250=2, srv1188591276=0, srv2020572505=5, srv2108790821=6, srv420864182=7, srv1206199929=1, srv1784369090=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv171764832=3, srv441615018=8, srv564952193=9, srv1538775250=2, srv1188591276=0, srv2020572505=5, srv2108790821=6, srv420864182=7, srv1206199929=1, srv1784369090=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv171764832=3, srv441615018=8, srv564952193=9, srv1538775250=2, srv1188591276=0, srv2020572505=5, srv2108790821=6, srv420864182=7, srv1206199929=1, srv1784369090=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv171764832=3, srv441615018=8, srv564952193=9, srv1538775250=2, srv1188591276=0, srv2020572505=5, srv2108790821=6, srv420864182=7, srv1206199929=1, srv1784369090=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv171764832=3, srv441615018=8, srv564952193=9, srv1538775250=2, srv1188591276=0, srv2020572505=5, srv2108790821=6, srv420864182=7, srv1206199929=1, srv1784369090=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv171764832=3, srv441615018=8, srv564952193=9, srv1538775250=2, srv1188591276=0, srv2020572505=5, srv2108790821=6, srv420864182=7, srv1206199929=1, srv1784369090=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv171764832=3, srv441615018=8, srv564952193=9, srv1538775250=2, srv1188591276=0, srv2020572505=5, srv2108790821=6, srv420864182=7, srv1206199929=1, srv1784369090=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv171764832=3, srv441615018=8, srv564952193=9, srv1538775250=2, srv1188591276=0, srv2020572505=5, srv2108790821=6, srv420864182=7, srv1206199929=1, srv1784369090=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-15 10:53:16,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-15 10:53:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-15 10:53:16,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-15 10:53:16,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-15 10:53:16,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-15 10:53:16,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-15 10:53:16,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-15 10:53:16,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-15 10:53:16,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-15 10:53:16,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-15 10:53:16,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-15 10:53:16,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-15 10:53:16,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-15 10:53:16,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-15 10:53:16,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-15 10:53:16,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-15 10:53:16,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv129318256=2, srv1423997891=3, srv667115198=8, srv580582958=7, srv1037356134=0, srv96698659=9, srv1044714686=1, srv241485464=6, srv1680555132=4, srv2141520018=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-15 10:53:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-15 10:53:16,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-15 10:53:16,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-15 10:53:16,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-15 10:53:16,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-15 10:53:16,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-15 10:53:16,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-15 10:53:16,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-15 10:53:16,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-15 10:53:16,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-15 10:53:16,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-15 10:53:16,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-15 10:53:16,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-15 10:53:16,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-15 10:53:16,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-15 10:53:16,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-15 10:53:16,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-15 10:53:16,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-15 10:53:16,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-15 10:53:16,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-15 10:53:16,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-15 10:53:16,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-15 10:53:16,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-15 10:53:16,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-15 10:53:16,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-15 10:53:16,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-15 10:53:16,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-15 10:53:16,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-15 10:53:16,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-15 10:53:16,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-15 10:53:16,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-15 10:53:16,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-15 10:53:16,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-15 10:53:16,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-15 10:53:16,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-15 10:53:16,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1614441506=4, srv13025626=1, srv1509464274=3, srv1035852415=0, srv1471076582=2, srv1678690270=5, srv1914767335=7, srv414828157=8, srv1871490829=6, srv851575155=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1348135974=1, srv1063677020=0, srv1504526803=3, srv1477016475=2, srv818265250=7, srv187224917=4, srv634288261=6, srv568098497=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1348135974=1, srv1063677020=0, srv1504526803=3, srv1477016475=2, srv818265250=7, srv187224917=4, srv634288261=6, srv568098497=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1348135974=1, srv1063677020=0, srv1504526803=3, srv1477016475=2, srv818265250=7, srv187224917=4, srv634288261=6, srv568098497=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1348135974=1, srv1063677020=0, srv1504526803=3, srv1477016475=2, srv818265250=7, srv187224917=4, srv634288261=6, srv568098497=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1348135974=1, srv1063677020=0, srv1504526803=3, srv1477016475=2, srv818265250=7, srv187224917=4, srv634288261=6, srv568098497=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1348135974=1, srv1063677020=0, srv1504526803=3, srv1477016475=2, srv818265250=7, srv187224917=4, srv634288261=6, srv568098497=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1348135974=1, srv1063677020=0, srv1504526803=3, srv1477016475=2, srv818265250=7, srv187224917=4, srv634288261=6, srv568098497=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1348135974=1, srv1063677020=0, srv1504526803=3, srv1477016475=2, srv818265250=7, srv187224917=4, srv634288261=6, srv568098497=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1348135974=1, srv1063677020=0, srv1504526803=3, srv1477016475=2, srv818265250=7, srv187224917=4, srv634288261=6, srv568098497=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1348135974=1, srv1063677020=0, srv1504526803=3, srv1477016475=2, srv818265250=7, srv187224917=4, srv634288261=6, srv568098497=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1348135974=1, srv1063677020=0, srv1504526803=3, srv1477016475=2, srv818265250=7, srv187224917=4, srv634288261=6, srv568098497=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1348135974=1, srv1063677020=0, srv1504526803=3, srv1477016475=2, srv818265250=7, srv187224917=4, srv634288261=6, srv568098497=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1348135974=1, srv1063677020=0, srv1504526803=3, srv1477016475=2, srv818265250=7, srv187224917=4, srv634288261=6, srv568098497=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1348135974=1, srv1063677020=0, srv1504526803=3, srv1477016475=2, srv818265250=7, srv187224917=4, srv634288261=6, srv568098497=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv841878442=6, srv364137345=5, srv2043453307=3, srv855983900=7, srv1047650231=0, srv2122544457=4, srv1914148444=2, srv1170420724=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv841878442=6, srv364137345=5, srv2043453307=3, srv855983900=7, srv1047650231=0, srv2122544457=4, srv1914148444=2, srv1170420724=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv841878442=6, srv364137345=5, srv2043453307=3, srv855983900=7, srv1047650231=0, srv2122544457=4, srv1914148444=2, srv1170420724=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv841878442=6, srv364137345=5, srv2043453307=3, srv855983900=7, srv1047650231=0, srv2122544457=4, srv1914148444=2, srv1170420724=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv841878442=6, srv364137345=5, srv2043453307=3, srv855983900=7, srv1047650231=0, srv2122544457=4, srv1914148444=2, srv1170420724=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv841878442=6, srv364137345=5, srv2043453307=3, srv855983900=7, srv1047650231=0, srv2122544457=4, srv1914148444=2, srv1170420724=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv841878442=6, srv364137345=5, srv2043453307=3, srv855983900=7, srv1047650231=0, srv2122544457=4, srv1914148444=2, srv1170420724=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv841878442=6, srv364137345=5, srv2043453307=3, srv855983900=7, srv1047650231=0, srv2122544457=4, srv1914148444=2, srv1170420724=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv841878442=6, srv364137345=5, srv2043453307=3, srv855983900=7, srv1047650231=0, srv2122544457=4, srv1914148444=2, srv1170420724=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv841878442=6, srv364137345=5, srv2043453307=3, srv855983900=7, srv1047650231=0, srv2122544457=4, srv1914148444=2, srv1170420724=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv841878442=6, srv364137345=5, srv2043453307=3, srv855983900=7, srv1047650231=0, srv2122544457=4, srv1914148444=2, srv1170420724=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv841878442=6, srv364137345=5, srv2043453307=3, srv855983900=7, srv1047650231=0, srv2122544457=4, srv1914148444=2, srv1170420724=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv841878442=6, srv364137345=5, srv2043453307=3, srv855983900=7, srv1047650231=0, srv2122544457=4, srv1914148444=2, srv1170420724=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv841878442=6, srv364137345=5, srv2043453307=3, srv855983900=7, srv1047650231=0, srv2122544457=4, srv1914148444=2, srv1170420724=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-15 10:53:16,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-15 10:53:16,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-15 10:53:16,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-15 10:53:16,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-15 10:53:16,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-15 10:53:16,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-15 10:53:16,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-15 10:53:16,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1067345955=0, srv1210562514=1, srv2159242=4, srv435181339=5, srv1679771368=2, srv2053530350=3, srv872435469=7, srv545871565=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-15 10:53:16,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-15 10:53:16,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-15 10:53:16,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-15 10:53:16,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-15 10:53:16,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-15 10:53:16,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-15 10:53:16,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-15 10:53:16,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-15 10:53:16,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-15 10:53:16,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-15 10:53:16,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1994869975=5, srv793524381=7, srv1569333983=2, srv582085664=6, srv170720257=3, srv1100686116=0, srv1471841646=1, srv1751495482=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv853007431=4, srv1436479350=0, srv2062098745=3, srv1747491365=1, srv1893428208=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv853007431=4, srv1436479350=0, srv2062098745=3, srv1747491365=1, srv1893428208=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv853007431=4, srv1436479350=0, srv2062098745=3, srv1747491365=1, srv1893428208=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv853007431=4, srv1436479350=0, srv2062098745=3, srv1747491365=1, srv1893428208=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv853007431=4, srv1436479350=0, srv2062098745=3, srv1747491365=1, srv1893428208=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:16,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:16,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:16,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:16,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:16,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:16,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:16,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:16,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:16,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:16,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:16,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:16,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:16,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:16,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:16,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:16,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:16,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:16,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:16,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv885697969=370, srv947584724=380, srv807305829=359, srv1831089904=171, srv1322424087=61, srv692524703=332, srv1612258111=131, srv1174511605=29, srv805510566=358, srv856630715=366, srv530626233=298, srv1376010776=72, srv2114694254=231, srv1173542926=28, srv491191967=291, srv242818772=244, srv1362191966=67, srv2128310412=236, srv732212615=343, srv1404046471=80, srv1834374567=172, srv1484519729=101, srv1652036097=139, srv1562817805=119, srv552806857=302, srv292422099=251, srv587842897=309, srv953592491=381, srv1527237196=111, srv1074081544=11, srv97864303=389, srv2019608271=211, srv2079951626=222, srv1531843417=113, srv169553038=147, srv59806606=314, srv856986841=367, srv2069034278=219, srv1348015434=64, srv1232061801=45, srv1664443098=142, srv432769184=284, srv1158463166=24, srv70604295=337, srv419658242=280, srv731165195=342, srv1623365614=134, srv710346865=338, srv1958599884=197, srv500049486=292, srv687902403=327, srv1448007020=89, srv276219681=246, srv1252411182=49, srv213880717=239, srv1430356819=87, srv991432149=391, srv7726656=352, srv2009077586=209, srv1107614742=16, srv968923636=384, srv1964391019=198, srv451883382=288, srv2087088039=226, srv1598053083=126, srv743524507=345, srv683300948=326, srv1023999933=5, srv1532947346=114, srv527494335=297, srv1496455840=104, srv1193887130=35, srv1944162083=196, srv1221213870=43, srv2023843880=213, srv2020590597=212, srv945028259=379, srv1035462369=7, srv805349133=357, srv1839547923=173, srv2118177468=232, srv695797443=334, srv187378154=182, srv1529424414=112, srv822330478=360, srv738788553=344, srv293619198=252, srv638349474=322, srv1768757521=163, srv1232910130=47, srv1981878457=204, srv2087983628=227, srv382693468=273, srv1533785671=115, srv755648371=348, srv230449528=242, srv1145000958=22, srv1246439496=48, srv463303168=290, srv1384002293=77, srv1754414511=161, srv234262645=243, srv714378740=339, srv110952834=17, srv1995591447=208, srv1969492450=201, srv571993641=304, srv786935965=353, srv983717274=390, srv1001937549=0, srv1912357384=193, srv1965121292=199, srv1509410520=108, srv596880731=313, srv1379333830=75, srv1294352818=59, srv1188346732=33, srv1585040222=123, srv1841182343=175, srv1536062882=116, srv2091329250=229, srv31913734=257, srv1602279191=129, srv2054932508=217, srv41383631=278, srv523371153=296, srv1815655570=170, srv1343198541=63, srv1417029280=82, srv173407098=155, srv1232022354=44, srv1426881511=86, srv347838077=265, srv1256348953=50, srv53407824=299, srv399621617=275, srv22410467=241, srv1787334276=166, srv1386948827=78, srv351332709=267, srv695150315=333, srv589293075=310, srv1232091480=46, srv2123540292=234, srv1026499837=6, srv1085054771=14, srv1579491163=121, srv2010654701=210, srv1840865617=174, srv1658504794=141, srv1215218909=41, srv150605237=106, srv728650197=340, srv1651533978=138, srv1017011671=3, srv449560498=286, srv1208971657=39, srv1477848823=99, srv1869019713=179, srv1355942764=65, srv359055368=268, srv1599948630=128, srv1207969247=38, srv1491687159=103, srv393252959=274, srv1649120460=137, srv1271643123=54, srv380344352=270, srv1989503238=206, srv1081616557=12, srv1723288285=151, srv1927004223=194, srv1478760381=100, srv19757304=203, srv271403131=245, srv1448892181=90, srv943864262=378, srv793840333=355, srv1265470427=51, srv148546637=102, srv1803021422=168, srv1616769649=132, srv1688510549=145, srv1652519531=140, srv75699734=349, srv1994219084=207, srv1158286348=23, srv2082714532=225, srv1041680728=8, srv1581336299=122, srv1180482780=30, srv1971926056=202, srv854173068=365, srv1378393404=73, srv2073638140=221, srv381537548=271, srv1773060122=164, srv1018339461=4, srv1321773478=60, srv1383011628=76, srv966646512=383, srv917699412=373, srv1115069847=19, srv1748721389=158, srv323062830=258, srv1218611778=42, srv629844875=319, srv690765078=331, srv1880403567=184, srv402007989=277, srv112384860=20, srv1753315284=160, srv1806018543=169, srv417824198=279, srv1180789144=31, srv580458444=306, srv1424530960=83, srv187961890=183, srv544305798=300, srv127782447=56, srv89649163=371, srv933510072=377, srv582858530=307, srv970476487=385, srv1415493619=81, srv850307437=364, srv1163147602=26, srv932874375=376, srv1883682894=185, srv752061544=346, srv995722363=392, srv1378475955=74, srv1212491691=40, srv2026504070=214, srv1733105495=154, srv198742201=205, srv1270054980=53, srv1466929876=96, srv369571833=269, srv508770268=293, srv101588204=1, srv303601056=254, srv284963993=248, srv546741831=301, srv689925388=330, srv1709220393=149, srv1082771190=13, srv1501049394=105, srv1673845014=144, srv163314672=135, srv978098028=388, srv753854054=347, srv2081422126=224, srv62946978=318, srv1204361299=37, srv573936679=305, srv1183928228=32, srv2035272309=215, srv1588818557=124, srv1461116624=94, srv429892158=282, srv1371530410=71, srv1912321899=192, srv845997125=362, srv2113201316=230, srv290651246=250, srv1016711714=2, srv1061043727=10, srv861390684=368, srv35019788=266, srv1161851907=25, srv1780684212=165, srv46077436=289, srv930033917=375, srv172902895=152, srv729708392=341, srv1610943467=130, srv766002279=350, srv159068079=125, srv1667724819=143, srv633558194=320, srv1476855993=98, srv595148258=312, srv1898906648=188, srv589342473=311, srv1560319695=118, srv619049817=316, srv345677161=264, srv1551753631=117, srv14262755=85, srv1722322183=150, srv836616259=361, srv1751863675=159, srv1450904436=91, srv14587594=92, srv1192409449=34, srv5842135=308, srv605349383=315, srv186612359=178, srv688043921=328, srv1883763100=186, srv324621483=259, srv1362111541=66, srv213361069=238, srv2124956156=235, srv63544248=321, srv1873244117=181, srv801754635=356, srv1334720883=62, srv449776430=287, srv2080140453=223, srv314991104=255, srv1142481934=21, srv401878148=276, srv973152087=386, srv965875195=382, srv1766996045=162, srv901711429=372, srv448145255=285, srv771160478=351, srv1507354520=107, srv332940171=261, srv792313706=354, srv2122329230=233, srv1471898225=97, srv1095231458=15, srv1364498459=68, srv1293154201=58, srv1738712354=156, srv185671460=177, srv689285529=329, srv381858185=272, srv1729538141=153, srv1892710809=187, srv698912018=335, srv299424016=253, srv2129965002=237, srv1599278738=127, srv1110020114=18, srv1634713465=136, srv1462602619=95, srv2088944952=228, srv1787915556=167, srv556585917=303, srv1577762853=120, srv1367853941=69, srv1425756006=84, srv1693910020=146, srv2056119580=218, srv699032089=336, srv1740270265=157, srv1706861998=148, srv517029140=294, srv670048867=324, srv1268960092=52, srv653131210=323, srv27809420=247, srv520129813=295, srv146030716=93, srv151739505=110, srv337209777=262, srv1291785885=57, srv1368147155=70, srv1905972867=190, srv325514566=260, srv1055756621=9, srv1908210061=191, srv432435523=283, srv1509985813=109, srv206937622=220, srv193719975=195, srv1619018654=133, srv1965910142=200, srv341617201=263, srv1165087453=27, srv1843231819=176, srv1899348069=189, srv878476669=369, srv285126319=249, srv1194105282=36, srv421984625=281, srv31680304=256, srv923634757=374, srv973459525=387, srv847811699=363, srv673475404=325, srv205185042=216, srv2145635392=240, srv139053736=79, srv627545725=317, srv1869627698=180, srv1276719319=55, srv1435698700=88} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:17,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:17,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:17,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:53:17,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:53:17,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:53:17,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:53:17,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:53:17,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:53:17,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:53:17,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:53:17,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:53:17,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:53:17,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:53:17,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:53:17,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:53:17,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:53:17,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:53:17,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:53:17,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:53:17,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:53:17,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-15 10:53:17,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 577.0 etc.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv544311277=0, srv984910572=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=3200
2023-07-15 10:53:17,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 29 ms to try 3200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1944344065=0, srv1957938089=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv625228495=1, srv1775395486=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv542982786=1, srv276505152=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1579832991=0, srv1700447062=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.2888503755054882 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.33333333333333337); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2077997955=1, srv1105285971=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2060814925=1, srv1705361930=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv530983284=0, srv977218673=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=10, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.6932409012131716 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.8); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv673042296=1, srv230062471=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1432, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.40878413881917497 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4717368961973279); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv160036355=0, srv2139162494=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=53, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.034662045060658585 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.04000000000000001); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:17,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv488319083=2, srv1508196020=1, srv1252779498=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:17,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:17,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:17,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:17,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896258); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:17,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.5003035261608543, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896258); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=7200
2023-07-15 10:53:18,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 27 ms to try 7200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.5003035261608543 to a new imbalance of 0.004043905257076833. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.3333333333333333); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv373098007=1, srv467449049=2, srv1746437678=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.25015176308042714 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.2886751345948129); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2010743796=2, srv1132327342=0, srv1990255593=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.33333333333333337); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.2888503755054882, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.33333333333333337); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=9600
2023-07-15 10:53:18,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 28 ms to try 9600 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.2888503755054882 to a new imbalance of 0.0030329289428076256. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.25); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1681147621=0, srv1865422955=1, srv293966083=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=7200
2023-07-15 10:53:18,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 17 ms to try 7200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 2 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.008087810514153667. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.6666666666666666); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv415335031=1, srv1583576333=0, srv7676921=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=9600
2023-07-15 10:53:18,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 22 ms to try 9600 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 2 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv628734502=2, srv1582646239=0, srv1946982558=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=20, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4871794871794873); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.42216593343109815, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4871794871794873); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=96000
2023-07-15 10:53:18,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 219 ms to try 96000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 13 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.42216593343109815 to a new imbalance of 0.003942807625649913. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.325); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv490031983=0, srv975475083=3, srv755816423=2, srv646961002=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:18,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.29457175359290033); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.25526148491585815, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.29457175359290033); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=19200
2023-07-15 10:53:18,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 24 ms to try 19200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.25526148491585815 to a new imbalance of 0.0020219526285384167. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.16666666666666666); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv554732287=2, srv1283759584=1, srv1186615713=0, srv663611406=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:18,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=12800
2023-07-15 10:53:18,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 15 ms to try 12800 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 3 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.009098786828422877. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.75); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv513001456=3, srv1597999566=1, srv2124379857=2, srv1432775284=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:18,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=5, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=16000
2023-07-15 10:53:18,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 20 ms to try 16000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 3 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.007279029462738302. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.6); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv192649374=2, srv1905935844=1, srv727338869=3, srv1594756718=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:18,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896257); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.5003035261608542, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896257); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=38400
2023-07-15 10:53:18,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 51 ms to try 38400 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 6 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.5003035261608542 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv884336323=3, srv108767404=0, srv541293097=2, srv337847605=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:18,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7071067811865475); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.6127441778046339, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7071067811865475); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=25600
2023-07-15 10:53:18,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 32 ms to try 25600 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.6127441778046339 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1457087755=0, srv208953167=1, srv2095832378=2, srv306962345=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:18,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7907604410896715); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.6852343510309111, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7907604410896715); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=22400
2023-07-15 10:53:18,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 29 ms to try 22400 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.6852343510309111 to a new imbalance of 0.006932409012131715. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5714285714285714); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv234817770=2, srv1811238130=1, srv1800658502=0, srv745603171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:18,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=19200
2023-07-15 10:53:18,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 26 ms to try 19200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.008087810514153667. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.6666666666666666); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv285261151=2, srv752296103=3, srv1094047839=0, srv1425661167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=7, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0962834585018294 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.11111111111111113); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv740976576=2, srv273606118=1, srv1342520815=0, srv922871961=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=8, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.17331022530329285 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.19999999999999996); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv531669751=2, srv177838531=0, srv2050729143=1, srv941248577=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:18,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=7, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=22400
2023-07-15 10:53:18,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 29 ms to try 22400 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 5 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.008665511265164644. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.7142857142857143); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2105850408=2, srv476552014=3, srv2104849199=1, srv1465392726=0, srv951661167=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:18,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:18,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.22705408170595567 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.26202041028867284); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:18,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825392921=3, srv1469647683=0, srv281256724=4, srv1679866794=1, srv582953600=5, srv1808358940=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:18,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:18,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:18,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:18,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:18,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:18,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1500, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:18,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4440183710462697); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:18,587 WARN  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(497): calculatedMaxSteps:14448000 for loadbalancer's stochastic walk is larger than maxSteps:1000000. Hence load balancing may not work well. Setting parameter "hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.runMaxSteps" to true can overcome this issue.(This config change does not require service restart)
2023-07-15 10:53:18,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.38476461962415054, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4440183710462697); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=1000000
2023-07-15 10:53:39,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 20460 ms to try 1000000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1026 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.38476461962415054 to a new imbalance of 0.004135262585143687. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.3408637873754153); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:39,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:53:39,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1671274924=1, srv326257404=3, srv1500159015=0, srv1863653096=2, srv460699777=5, srv408688670=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:53:39,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:53:39,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:53:39,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:53:39,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:53:39,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:53:39,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:53:39,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1500, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:53:39,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.3438084096789955); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:53:39,083 WARN  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(497): calculatedMaxSteps:16800000 for loadbalancer's stochastic walk is larger than maxSteps:1000000. Hence load balancing may not work well. Setting parameter "hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.runMaxSteps" to true can overcome this issue.(This config change does not require service restart)
2023-07-15 10:53:39,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.2979275647131677, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.3438084096789955); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=1000000
2023-07-15 10:54:01,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 22579 ms to try 1000000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 921 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.2979275647131677 to a new imbalance of 0.003192374350086655. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.2631428571428571); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:01,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:01,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1486038238=3, srv395442338=13, srv1881725632=9, srv338216870=11, srv1529787801=4, srv347307569=12, srv1693165687=8, srv572961311=14, srv1537923896=5, srv1659904069=7, srv1437865070=2, srv1182740040=1, srv2078496125=10, srv1064841432=0, srv1596278447=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:01,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:01,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:01,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:01,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:01,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:01,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:01,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:01,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:01,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:54:01,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:54:01,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:54:01,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:54:01,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:54:01,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=15, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.12507588154021357 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.14433756729740646); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1655773515=3, srv1950134496=4, srv429757303=6, srv1220611535=1, srv2165564=5, srv882991959=9, srv1150914156=0, srv1620526812=2, srv701709845=7, srv834410586=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:54:01,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=10, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:01,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:01,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=80000
2023-07-15 10:54:01,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 109 ms to try 80000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 9 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.010918544194107453. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.9); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:01,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:01,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2102017009=5, srv955209142=9, srv1672831911=3, srv943965145=8, srv1640661185=2, srv1729617764=4, srv377798553=7, srv1142216712=0, srv210445767=6, srv1295562473=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:01,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:01,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:01,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:01,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:01,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:01,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:01,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:01,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:01,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:54:01,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:54:01,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:01,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.055531997651093117 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.06408392528936147); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:01,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:01,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv155750995=2, srv1897011985=3, srv405338565=5, srv1301435059=0, srv915704444=9, srv659941383=6, srv667737820=7, srv1554923953=1, srv402049000=4, srv743896590=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:01,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:01,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:01,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:01,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:01,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:01,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:01,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:01,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:01,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:54:01,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:54:01,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=54, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:01,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:01,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=432000
2023-07-15 10:54:02,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 811 ms to try 432000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 48 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.01078374735220489. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.8888888888888888); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:02,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:02,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1339128883=0, srv1868618860=4, srv1812317316=3, srv682851126=8, srv825585611=9, srv1506870731=1, srv214241833=5, srv1586622340=2, srv524824279=6, srv616321404=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:02,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:02,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:02,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:02,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:02,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:02,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:02,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:02,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:02,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:54:02,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:54:02,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=55, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:02,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:02,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=440000
2023-07-15 10:54:03,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 820 ms to try 440000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 49 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.010808255868914448. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.8909090909090909); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:03,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:03,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1381375061=2, srv200106920=5, srv2032955499=7, srv902908885=9, srv378099893=8, srv1482998184=3, srv2026716152=6, srv1287506804=1, srv1283114416=0, srv1975244622=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:03,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:03,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:03,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:03,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:03,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:03,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:03,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:03,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:03,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:54:03,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:54:03,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=56, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:03,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:03,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=448000
2023-07-15 10:54:04,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 835 ms to try 448000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 50 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.010831889081455806. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.8928571428571429); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:04,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:04,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv203018067=5, srv41576726=7, srv1460302976=1, srv586772596=9, srv556123898=8, srv1692923881=2, srv1956060662=4, srv1098730093=0, srv1939449423=3, srv408163451=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:04,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:04,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:04,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:04,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:04,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:04,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:04,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:04,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:54:04,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:54:04,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=16, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:04,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=128000
2023-07-15 10:54:04,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 196 ms to try 128000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 14 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.01061525129982669. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.875); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:04,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:04,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446102005=2, srv893426703=9, srv1996756314=5, srv132965940=1, srv377377807=6, srv128388299=0, srv867948480=8, srv1557144293=3, srv1621072230=4, srv592106795=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:04,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:04,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:04,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:04,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:04,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:04,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:04,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:04,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:54:04,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:54:04,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=8, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.30649131741006164 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.35369098029121115); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1738519501=2, srv561681685=9, srv1891857931=5, srv1825136399=4, srv486627554=8, srv1964622532=6, srv1292988575=0, srv1449526884=1, srv223446679=7, srv1794349632=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=9, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.34662045060658575 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.39999999999999997); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1339258386=3, srv128795984=2, srv1114742280=0, srv1259926888=1, srv1656684140=5, srv39224003=6, srv832722394=9, srv819847289=8, srv1351462806=4, srv611585093=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:04,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:04,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:04,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:04,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:04,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:04,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:54:04,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:54:04,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=10, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.3851338340073175 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4444444444444444); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:04,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:04,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1613473970=3, srv1056635630=1, srv375871552=8, srv603573303=9, srv1028021249=0, srv1915986739=6, srv1951234103=7, srv126998909=2, srv1715015576=4, srv1874047702=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:04,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:04,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:04,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:04,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:04,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:04,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:04,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:04,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:54:04,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:54:04,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=123, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.8002334382626535 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.923469387755102); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:04,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:04,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv19215508=3, srv1981959466=4, srv208201348=5, srv1752306203=2, srv2101944130=6, srv1093862252=0, srv82366962=8, srv878758177=9, srv1493036226=1, srv509813762=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:04,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:04,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:04,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:04,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:04,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:04,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:04,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:04,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:54:04,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:54:04,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=155, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.8131812243798632 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9384111329343621); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:04,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:04,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv688719326=6, srv594068353=5, srv1186623166=0, srv363559278=4, srv1471650456=1, srv330225469=3, srv767502608=7, srv162386302=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:04,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:04,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:04,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:04,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:04,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:04,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:04,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:04,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=14, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.05755254949858986 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0664156421213727); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:04,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:04,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1814372370=2, srv1173220200=0, srv1403675470=1, srv1900722260=3, srv372481271=5, srv725498677=6, srv974415875=7, srv342559010=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:04,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:04,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:04,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:04,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:04,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:04,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:04,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:04,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=14, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.06673965003400768 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.07701755613924488); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:04,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:04,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv270565934=5, srv945767955=7, srv237387424=4, srv1131851790=1, srv1719243803=2, srv686501003=6, srv108680696=0, srv1961235311=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:04,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:04,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:04,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:04,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:04,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:04,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:04,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:04,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=130, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.28093705674099306 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.32420136347910594); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:04,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:04,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1018718752=0, srv858969068=7, srv2120373854=2, srv32206526=3, srv394632060=4, srv1116216109=1, srv64656622=6, srv485181533=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:04,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:04,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:04,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:04,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:04,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:04,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:04,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:04,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=140, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.07533492111851356 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.08693649897076465); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:04,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:04,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv807002488=4, srv225372452=0, srv572019210=2, srv283995187=1, srv761416981=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:04,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:04,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:04,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:04,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:04,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=5, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.25); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:04,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.21663778162911612, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.25); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=80000
2023-07-15 10:54:04,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 108 ms to try 80000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.21663778162911612 to a new imbalance of 0.0024263431542461008. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.2); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:04,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-15 10:54:04,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv735221024=339, srv787940458=357, srv1884220126=168, srv1226361296=42, srv1496705587=100, srv296860858=248, srv1712734748=140, srv433156360=281, srv1436585246=86, srv851572729=364, srv1821857730=154, srv2118058140=220, srv1120033458=23, srv249500819=232, srv1950775351=181, srv1292816483=62, srv1255028484=51, srv1570754276=115, srv1711512509=139, srv676090759=328, srv25162376=234, srv563390082=305, srv1145624444=27, srv1269536494=55, srv543778789=301, srv1842330608=161, srv74125700=341, srv903551771=378, srv253033844=235, srv472679480=290, srv1284087616=60, srv505166139=295, srv610285502=313, srv1963432353=185, srv770673862=353, srv871681744=372, srv734808901=338, srv1201359779=38, srv1082685267=12, srv738339102=340, srv851046710=363, srv1252358567=50, srv1927621280=176, srv1548667828=111, srv315910267=258, srv1998750702=191, srv561713013=303, srv1256428949=53, srv1477546437=96, srv1788257183=153, srv1151110101=29, srv133202694=68, srv1930969720=177, srv1390661294=75, srv26319819=239, srv963878892=388, srv1647654757=126, srv61456651=314, srv72069752=335, srv752683069=345, srv1786308966=152, srv609474072=312, srv297179844=249, srv757346958=349, srv753496739=348, srv1231339709=45, srv1784643694=151, srv439401206=282, srv1509658243=102, srv479734560=291, srv1049495972=5, srv237789799=231, srv1225474006=41, srv1101961121=19, srv1168415999=35, srv1020954394=0, srv866992000=370, srv1341694014=69, srv1503205301=101, srv1315541841=64, srv1097055530=17, srv1451880723=89, srv1231702268=46, srv1048213520=4, srv2042610941=204, srv2037508879=200, srv250558629=233, srv989645175=390, srv2126148237=221, srv1207298877=39, srv305031460=252, srv1324392049=65, srv419857534=277, srv274774849=240, srv1328239782=66, srv615374630=315, srv321551811=260, srv2068872886=210, srv775415109=355, srv641908636=319, srv1833297023=158, srv1226720367=43, srv1922676480=174, srv1496637274=99, srv708875243=331, srv974789811=389, srv19977839=190, srv390760249=274, srv2048013503=206, srv1116901962=21, srv2099478422=218, srv448572643=284, srv1836594759=159, srv1875830189=165, srv1481426645=98, srv66804373=324, srv1093647417=16, srv1982320130=188, srv428284328=279, srv134982852=70, srv675143550=327, srv369008489=269, srv1056723209=6, srv1653624867=129, srv1272425787=57, srv632314059=317, srv1651914135=127, srv490744637=292, srv464236561=288, srv1665626154=132, srv774896376=354, srv1406301062=78, srv621808798=316, srv1553487699=112, srv1936470425=178, srv2089353810=215, srv1520882315=105, srv1328477304=67, srv1433730882=84, srv2032845785=199, srv2100328525=219, srv931543645=382, srv506112765=296, srv854966528=366, srv1278454415=59, srv1059382559=8, srv1073174823=9, srv1452573815=90, srv494147208=294, srv944845534=383, srv909522295=380, srv898876404=377, srv237028892=230, srv1472167366=95, srv1273506745=58, srv293210097=246, srv298778310=251, srv459429096=285, srv1152161835=30, srv1401277316=76, srv37830911=270, srv1698845325=138, srv1047890859=3, srv226400286=228, srv127213412=56, srv136099169=71, srv123029984=44, srv1211908830=40, srv753306607=346, srv366988983=267, srv423577168=278, srv285234126=244, srv961632657=387, srv1136465843=24, srv1461159104=92, srv1235407252=47, srv1825895062=157, srv1720502074=142, srv1900195477=171, srv443122010=283, srv1878487013=167, srv1971685838=186, srv1921471433=172, srv2082794491=213, srv960165743=386, srv786667849=356, srv491368675=293, srv329416987=262, srv88382716=375, srv1692533536=136, srv33451249=264, srv108600124=13, srv332938696=263, srv1155235267=31, srv1078542153=11, srv1889964237=170, srv795807984=359, srv2141444289=225, srv368482396=268, srv1405383877=77, srv1467447056=94, srv89180346=376, srv1877059341=166, srv578258948=309, srv204788457=205, srv659362165=322, srv947510815=384, srv324647221=261, srv1525498071=106, srv1679163178=135, srv1673336947=133, srv1163855343=33, srv2074265031=211, srv2039383691=202, srv70896168=332, srv1716096832=141, srv2086957078=214, srv390562485=273, srv1455982592=91, srv748159214=343, srv1870866408=163, srv1770451715=149, srv64369127=321, srv1029139955=2, srv1640570997=124, srv1090897010=14, srv1146016575=28, srv1439856142=87, srv1415818389=82, srv1256209283=52, srv384254872=272, srv863660156=369, srv572905013=308, srv1024632816=1, srv1178625887=36, srv1478776988=97, srv1822750237=155, srv1144491770=26, srv538933150=300, srv1655028608=130, srv1632568109=121, srv1563410222=113, srv2133074897=223, srv1540074644=110, srv283322267=242, srv2005843986=192, srv857273838=367, srv640035071=318, srv1093259590=15, srv320600902=259, srv569757130=306, srv712449890=333, srv284265604=243, srv1660852505=131, srv85419839=365, srv1290008018=61, srv2081435849=212, srv20305764=198, srv731958995=337, srv919494636=381, srv751751131=344, srv883620696=374, srv570509412=307, srv255695393=237, srv2022160780=196, srv1963236971=184, srv2041263518=203, srv275199324=241, srv1922900019=175, srv1390115474=74, srv462964365=287, srv115797485=32, srv1959737930=183, srv1941935039=179, srv1771126945=150, srv1675519708=134, srv1954733829=182, srv349822181=265, srv1058470528=7, srv669000911=325, srv297269473=250, srv1428286774=83, srv795378935=358, srv743719009=342, srv309989697=255, srv1993133207=189, srv2092389405=216, srv536369700=299, srv642199638=320, srv42906845=280, srv233349873=229, srv253996788=236, srv818914310=361, srv1567120522=114, srv164353408=125, srv693956013=330, srv713964293=334, srv1732415772=144, srv875331932=373, srv119046304=37, srv1849257396=162, srv1633925435=122, srv954054614=385, srv140898391=79, srv1117012855=22, srv311916755=257, srv1728672747=143, srv1823725982=156, srv293345047=247, srv594911143=310, srv832266223=362, srv1440166813=88, srv1467130036=93, srv2022655627=197, srv293154082=245, srv462679571=286, srv1519414822=104, srv153109770=108, srv258558272=238, srv201238548=193, srv307191681=254, srv563127515=304, srv1745057361=146, srv2050072007=207, srv2050342579=208, srv1165587206=34, srv216376988=226, srv355567417=266, srv1694956748=137, srv1241541622=48, srv1114773246=20, srv1261842418=54, srv1412172197=81, srv418956136=276, srv75341105=347, srv1433753192=85, srv550628235=302, srv2129244520=222, srv1511692862=103, srv728104205=336, srv1885846358=169, srv990987474=392, srv765851255=352, srv1411143537=80, srv30677102=253, srv1587704974=117, srv1139585848=25, srv671454733=326, srv2134568268=224, srv1573403403=116, srv1526432236=107, srv1374307846=72, srv20549194=209, srv380110545=271, srv2020401857=195, srv7574450=350, srv1630960529=120, srv1608545752=118, srv2038029691=201, srv1620997701=119, srv1975505743=187, srv410844382=275, srv1246375307=49, srv1871450167=164, srv222466898=227, srv1078199565=10, srv1315004991=63, srv870946563=371, srv908167545=379, srv511066482=297, srv806493742=360, srv1099663529=18, srv1754772952=148, srv514248194=298, srv2019314363=194, srv464892533=289, srv1949412250=180, srv1738936404=145, srv1640266174=123, srv137812998=73, srv311198175=256, srv606001562=311, srv858100644=368, srv1921673030=173, srv684233908=329, srv165246748=128, srv1837635668=160, srv2098542557=217, srv662395537=323, srv1534512266=109, srv1751072758=147, srv761355830=351, srv990759514=391} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-15 10:54:04,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-15 10:54:04,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-15 10:54:04,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-15 10:54:04,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-15 10:54:04,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-15 10:54:04,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-15 10:54:04,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-15 10:54:04,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-15 10:54:04,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-15 10:54:04,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-15 10:54:04,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-15 10:54:04,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-15 10:54:04,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-15 10:54:04,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=56, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-15 10:54:04,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999986); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:04,613 WARN  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(497): calculatedMaxSteps:17606400 for loadbalancer's stochastic walk is larger than maxSteps:1000000. Hence load balancing may not work well. Setting parameter "hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.runMaxSteps" to true can overcome this issue.(This config change does not require service restart)
2023-07-15 10:54:04,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164632, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999986); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=1000000
2023-07-15 10:54:11,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 6922 ms to try 1000000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 55 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164632 to a new imbalance of 0.011915077989601387. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.9821428571428571); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-15 10:54:11,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-15 10:54:11,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 577.0 etc.
2023-07-15 10:54:11,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] hbase.ResourceChecker(175): after: master.balancer.TestBalancerDecision#testBalancerDecisions Thread=13 (was 12)
Potentially hanging thread: Time-limited test.slowlog.append-pool-0
	sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
	java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
	java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
	com.lmax.disruptor.BlockingWaitStrategy.waitFor(BlockingWaitStrategy.java:47)
	com.lmax.disruptor.ProcessingSequenceBarrier.waitFor(ProcessingSequenceBarrier.java:56)
	com.lmax.disruptor.BatchEventProcessor.processEvents(BatchEventProcessor.java:159)
	com.lmax.disruptor.BatchEventProcessor.run(BatchEventProcessor.java:125)
	java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:750)
 - Thread LEAK? -, OpenFileDescriptor=263 (was 263), MaxFileDescriptor=60000 (was 60000), SystemLoadAverage=245 (was 288), ProcessCount=175 (was 175), AvailableMemoryMB=6479 (was 7770)